2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.preghy.2018.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive value of sFlt-1, PlGF, sFlt-1/PlGF ratio and PAPP-A for late-onset preeclampsia and IUGR between 32 and 37 weeks of pregnancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
32
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
6
32
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Vascular abnormalities during pregnancy change angiogenic markers such as Flt-1 and PIGF [34]. These markers and their ratio are important in clinical monitoring of patients with preeclampsia, and they are used on a regular basis [35][36][37]. The Flt-1/PIGF ratio is increasingly used in the study of restricted intrauterine growth [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vascular abnormalities during pregnancy change angiogenic markers such as Flt-1 and PIGF [34]. These markers and their ratio are important in clinical monitoring of patients with preeclampsia, and they are used on a regular basis [35][36][37]. The Flt-1/PIGF ratio is increasingly used in the study of restricted intrauterine growth [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,3,13,14,16,[34][35][36][37][38] The majority of studies recruited patients with SGA as outcome. [1][2][3][4][13][14][15][16][21][22][23]25,26,[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] The definition for SGA was lower than the 10th birthweight percentiles upper reference limit in 18 studies. 3,4,[13][14][15][16][21][22][23]25,26,[29][30][31][32]34,35,…”
Section: Study and Data Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 At this moment, there is no conclusive evidence that measuring maternal angiogenic biomarkers are (also) useful in the clinical management of fetal growth restriction. Despite many studies linking maternal angiogenic concentrations to the neonatal outcomes (mainly SGA), 3,[11][12][13][14][15][16] there is no systematic review of the predictive performance of PlGF, sFlt-1 and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio at different trimesters of pregnancy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Одним из возможных решений мог бы быть расчет иных пороговых уровней подтверждения и прогноза ПЭ у пациенток с ожирением на основании более обширных исследований, если придерживаться мнения, что ожирение повышает чувствительность эндотелия к дисбалансу факторов ангиогенеза, тем самым снижая порог развития ПЭ [31]. Так, в одном из исследований уровня sFlt-1/PigF среди пациенток с поздней ПЭ и повышенным иМТ был рассчитан порог 57 ед с чувствительностью 84 % и специфичностью 93 % [32].…”
Section: Discussionunclassified