2019
DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.12965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive value of skeletal muscle mass for immunotherapy with nivolumab in non‐small cell lung cancer patients: A “hypothesis‐generator” preliminary report

Abstract: Sarcopenia represents one of the hallmarks of all chronic disease, including non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A computed tomography scan is an easy modality to estimate the skeletal muscle mass through cross‐sectional image analysis at the level of the third lumbar vertebra (L3). Baseline skeletal muscle mass (SMM) was evaluated using gender‐specific cutoffs for skeletal muscle index in NSCLC patients administered immunotherapy with nivolumab to evaluate its possible correlations with clinical outcomes. Fro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
55
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
7
55
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding was contrary to that of the previous study [23]. To our knowledge, only two small sample-sized studies by Shiroyama (N = 42) [23] and by Cortellini (N = 23) [24] evaluated PMI or SMI at the third lumber vertebra (L3) with PFS of PD-1 inhibitors for pretreated and advanced NSCLC, respectively. In the former Japanese study, the comparison between sarcopenic (low PMI) and non-sarcopenic (high PMI) patients detected significant differences in PFS, overall response rate and 1-year PFS rate [23].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding was contrary to that of the previous study [23]. To our knowledge, only two small sample-sized studies by Shiroyama (N = 42) [23] and by Cortellini (N = 23) [24] evaluated PMI or SMI at the third lumber vertebra (L3) with PFS of PD-1 inhibitors for pretreated and advanced NSCLC, respectively. In the former Japanese study, the comparison between sarcopenic (low PMI) and non-sarcopenic (high PMI) patients detected significant differences in PFS, overall response rate and 1-year PFS rate [23].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…In the former Japanese study, the comparison between sarcopenic (low PMI) and non-sarcopenic (high PMI) patients detected significant differences in PFS, overall response rate and 1-year PFS rate [23]. However, probably owing to the small sample size, the latter Italian hypothesis-generating preliminary report failed to demonstrate significant differences in PFS and OS between low and high SMI [24]. Unlike these two studies, our study included five patients treated with PD-L1 inhibitor, atezolizumab, and more sarcopenic patients with low skeletal muscle quantity (72% of low PMI in our study vs. 52% of low PMI in Shiroyama's study, and 34.6% of low SMM in Cortellini's study).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Recently, skeletal muscle mass has been included in prognostic score, which independently predicts survival in patients treated with anti PD-1/PD-L1 (programmed deadth-1/programmed death-ligand 1) agents 8 . In a preliminary report, we found that sarcopenic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving nivolumab had shorter progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) 9 . Moreover, other two retrospective studies found a significant association between sarcopenia, shorter PFS and worse objective response rate (ORR) 10,11 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, no study has yet evaluated sarcopenia in the context of pembrolizumab treatment for melanoma using this simple method. Only limited research has been published on sarcopenia in patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors, yet existing evidence indicates that radiographic sarcopenia may be associated with higher frequency of toxicity and lower response rates (23,28). In contrast with these prior studies, no relationship between sarcopenia and treatment outcomes were identified in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinicopathologic differences across BMI categories. After patients were divided into BMI groups as conducted in a prior study (23), 42 patients (27%) fell into the low/average BMI group (BMI less than 25), 56 patients (36%) were overweight (BMI greater than or equal to 25 and less than 30) and 58 patients (37%) were obese (BMI of 30 or greater). Other than the previously mentioned differences in sarcopenia rates, patients in the three BMI categories differed in sex, with obese patients being more likely to be men (p=0.047).…”
Section: Clinicopathologic Differences Across Sarcopenic Designationsmentioning
confidence: 99%