2017
DOI: 10.15452/cejnm.2017.08.0006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive Value of the Morse Fall Scale

Abstract: Aim: The goal of this study was to analyse relevant research studies focusing on the testing of the predictive value of the Morse Fall Scale measuring device on hospitalized patients. Design: Literature review. Method: Search for full text research studies in Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Summon Discovery Tool (licensed electronic information databases), based on pre-established criteria, and key words, from 1989 to 2016. Results: Sensitivity values ranged from 31% to 98%, and specificity values r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is also worth mentioning that, despite the aforementioned advantages, these numerical tools have limitations. For example, a patient who was scored as not at risk of fall might fall accidentally (Bóriková et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is also worth mentioning that, despite the aforementioned advantages, these numerical tools have limitations. For example, a patient who was scored as not at risk of fall might fall accidentally (Bóriková et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morse Fall Scale (MFS) is by far one of the most commonly used tools across the world. The tool was developed by Janice M. Morse in 1989 by testing the tool among a dened population group comprising of medical surgical acute, long term, and rehabilitative care (Bóriková et al, 2017). History of fall in the last three months, secondary diagnosis, IV therapy, ambulatory aid, gait, and mental status were identied as the six elements of MFS as these increase the risk of fall in hospitalised patients (as cited by Yazdani & Hall, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In testing for the best predictive values of the MFS in various clinical environments, a cut-off of between 25 and a maximum of 55 is recommended by Morse. The prediction value of MFS changes depending on many factors (such as tested cut-off value, type of setting, size and age of the sample, individual patient factors, assessment frequency) and that is why this tool needs to be tested in the same setting at which it is intended to be used [13,22,[39][40][41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is why multifactorial assessment is emphasized. In order to identify fall risks and risk factors, it is necessary to introduce a system of standardized fall risk assessment as a part of a preventive programme in a facility [5,8,13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is usually a list of items used to control the level and character of risk based on a combined score of several factors that are known to be related to risk of fall. These tools include the MFS (Scott et al, 2007), which, when correctly administered, has established psychometric characteristics (Bóriková et al, 2017) and provides valuable data for planning care according to fall risk (the total score). The items of the MFS, however, also identify individual risk profiles, which makes it possible to tailor interventions to specific risk factors (Morse, 2009; Centre for Studies in Aging & Health, 2010;Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%