1989
DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1989.tb04172.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive value of venom‐specific IgE, IgG and IgG subclass antibodies in patients on immunotherapy with honey bee venom

Abstract: Sixty-seven patients with a history of severe systemic reactions following honey bee stings were treated by immunotherapy (IT) with honey bee venom. During maintenance therapy all were submitted to a sting challenge under clinical conditions. 15 developed mostly minor symptoms of a systemic reaction while 52 showed only a local swelling at the sting site. Phospholipase A2-specific IgE, IgG and IgG subclass serum antibodies were estimated in samples obtained before IT and immediately before the challenge. Speci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
82
4
7

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
82
4
7
Order By: Relevance
“…2C). A decline of allergen-specific IgE and induction of allergen-specific IgG responses have been demonstrated in human subjects after IT (35,36). Accordingly, also levels of OVA-specific IgE were reduced in the present model in mice with OVA-IT, whereas levels of OVA-specific IgG1 were increased in comparison with sensitized and challenged animals (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…2C). A decline of allergen-specific IgE and induction of allergen-specific IgG responses have been demonstrated in human subjects after IT (35,36). Accordingly, also levels of OVA-specific IgE were reduced in the present model in mice with OVA-IT, whereas levels of OVA-specific IgG1 were increased in comparison with sensitized and challenged animals (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…However assays that detect only immunoreactive IgG4 are unlikely to predict clinical efficacy (Djurup et al, 1987;Muller et al, 1989;Ewan et al, 1993;Bodtger et al 2005). Therefore, measuring IgG4 concentration is not suitable for monitoring clinical efficacy of immunotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most prominent response to allergen IT treatment in allergic individuals is the induction of allergen-specific IgG1 and IgG4 responses, yet the relevance of the IT-induced IgG Ab response has remained controversial (1). Although some studies reported observations that indicate a contribution of blocking Abs to IT (41), several groups failed to show a correlation between the presence of neutralizing IgG Abs and improved clinical outcome (6,42). The allergen-specific IgG Abs might contribute to IT by blocking access of the allergen to IgE on mast cells or basophils or by preventing FcεRI-dependent mast cell activation by binding to FcgRIIB (reviewed in Ref.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%