2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictive values of BI-RADS ® magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DCIS is a type of non-invasive malignant neoplasm of the breast, currently its management includes surgical removal, either by mastectomy or breast conserving surgery (BCS) that minimising the volume of tissue resected leads to better cosmetic results, margin positivity is an important risk factor for recurrent disease post BCS (18) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DCIS is a type of non-invasive malignant neoplasm of the breast, currently its management includes surgical removal, either by mastectomy or breast conserving surgery (BCS) that minimising the volume of tissue resected leads to better cosmetic results, margin positivity is an important risk factor for recurrent disease post BCS (18) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study identified the Bi-RADS categories according to the MRI parameters in the detection of malignant tumors. It was observed a VPN equal to 100% for categories 2 and 3 and notably 98.04% for category 1, showing that there is still a possibility of FN occurring in this method [10] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Category 4 presented a PPV of 87.5% for malignancy, which reinforces the recommendation of histological correlation as the only option, while category 5 exhibited a PPV equal to 100% for malignancy, alerting for high suspicion of invasive carcinomas when evaluating the diagnosis of malignant neoplasm. It is necessary to keep the histopathological type in mind and interpret the imaging findings more comprehensively [10,11] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jeffers et al4 predicted breast cancer risks by BI-RADS classification, with an AUC of 0.68. Evans et al13 reported that the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound-based BI-RADS scores to identify benign and malignant breast tumors were 0.95 and 0.69, respectively; however, some studies evaluating the prognostic value of BI-RADS classification reported that it was a negative prognostic indicator 11,48. To evaluate differences related to the ethnicity of patients enrolled in the study and variation related to ultrasonography itself, we determined the cutoff value for ultrasound-based BI-RADS scores and PD-1 mRNA expression using ROC curves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%