2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.02.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictivity of uterine artery, arcuate artery, and intraovarian artery Doppler indices measured on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin injection on pregnancy outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of different studies are conflicting some confirmed the usefulness of the indices whereas others did not. [ 13 14 15 16 17 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results of different studies are conflicting some confirmed the usefulness of the indices whereas others did not. [ 13 14 15 16 17 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They indicated that mean of PI and RI of uterine arteries and RI in arcuate arteries were significantly lower in women with successful IVF than those with the unsuccessful procedure. [ 15 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other authors [19] investigated a possible marker to predict a fertile cycle by comparing uterine and ovarian blood flow in the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle in women who conceived and women who did not conceive during that cycle. Others [20] studied the possible predictivity of intraovarian artery Doppler indices on pregnancy outcomes. However, there are some considerations whose make our study different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Na medicina humana, problemas similares são encontrados em mulheres inférteis submetidas ao tratamento com gonadotrofinas para a fertilização in vitro (FIV) e programas de TE, mostrando a baixa previsibilidade das taxas de concepção, principalmente devido a variações na receptividade uterina (COULAM et al, 1994;STEER et al, 1995;CACCIATORE et al, 1996;GROUTZ et al, 1997;TOHMA et al, 1997;CHIEN et al, 2002;ADAKAN et al, 2005;LILIC et al, 2007). Diversos parâmetros têm sido propostos para a avaliação da receptividade endometrial em mulheres, incluindo a espessura endometrial, o padrão endometrial e o fluxo sangüíneo endometrial e subendometrial (COULAM et al, 1994;APPLEBAUM, 1995;ZAIDI et al, 1995;REMOHI et al, 1997;SUNDSTROM, 1998;BOURGAIN et al, 2003).…”
Section: -Estroginunclassified