Proceedings of the 2010 American Control Conference 2010
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2010.5531212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictor-based control for an uncertain Euler-Lagrange system with input delay

Abstract: Control of nonlinear systems with actuator delay is a challenging problem because of the need to develop some form of prediction of the nonlinear dynamics. The problem becomes more difficult for systems with uncertain dynamics. In this paper, tracking controllers are developed for an Euler-Lagrange system with time-delayed actuation, parametric uncertainty, and additive bounded disturbances. One controller is developed under the assumption that the inertia is known, and a second controller is developed when th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering this factor, some other methods need to be proposed to deal with the input delay. At present, there are a few results reported on uncertain nonlinear systems with input delay . Specifically, a predictor‐based controller, which contained a finite integral of past control value, was developed in References to for a class of uncertain nonlinear systems with matching condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering this factor, some other methods need to be proposed to deal with the input delay. At present, there are a few results reported on uncertain nonlinear systems with input delay . Specifically, a predictor‐based controller, which contained a finite integral of past control value, was developed in References to for a class of uncertain nonlinear systems with matching condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark The previous research studies about adaptive robust control methods with input time delay focused on the CT form . In our research, we propose a novel neural network optimal control method for time‐delay DT systems instead of CT systems with time delays.…”
Section: A Novel Neural Network Optimal Control Design For Nonlinear mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (4), J ∈ ℝ n × n denotes the unknown inertia of a limb fixed in a test apparatus, C s ∈ ℝ n × n denotes the Centripetal/Coriolis matrix, M e ∈ ℝ n denotes the moment generated by the passive elastic properties of the muscles, M υ ∈ ℝ n denotes the moment generated by the passive viscous properties of the muscles, M g ∈ ℝ n denotes the gravitational torque acting on the limb, and d ( t ) ∈ ℝ n denotes any disturbances that may arise in the system. For detailed definitions of M e , M υ , and M g , see [33]. The input to the FES system, Γ s ( t ) ∈ ℝ n , is the torque produced using FES, and F e ( t ) ∈ ℝ n is the interaction force between the musculoskeletal system and environment.…”
Section: System Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The force-velocity relationship is bounded by a non-zero number since it only equals zero when the muscle shortening velocity is near its maximum which is outside the range of the velocities imposed in this control problem. Note that the first time derivative of Ω is not assumed nor required to be bounded, unlike our earlier papers [17, 33]. …”
Section: Control Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%