2019
DOI: 10.1109/tcst.2017.2781651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictor-Based Disturbance Rejection Control for Sampled Systems With Input Delay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming that the control input u(t) is bounded, that is u(t) ≤ u d . Consider the nonlinear system Equation (11) and the present adaptive RBF neural network observer system Equation (24), Equation (22) and Equation (34), then the state estimated error x(t) and the neural network weight estimated errors W 1 (t) and W 2 (t) are UUB. See the Appendix B for the proof.…”
Section: Assumption 2 [43]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Assuming that the control input u(t) is bounded, that is u(t) ≤ u d . Consider the nonlinear system Equation (11) and the present adaptive RBF neural network observer system Equation (24), Equation (22) and Equation (34), then the state estimated error x(t) and the neural network weight estimated errors W 1 (t) and W 2 (t) are UUB. See the Appendix B for the proof.…”
Section: Assumption 2 [43]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predictive approach is very efficient for calculating the time delay [7,8]. To predict the state parameter precisely, different predictive methods have been investigated, such as the Smith predictive method [9][10][11], a Kalman estimator [12,13], feed-forward control [14], reference model based control [15,16], and a state space observer approach [17,18]. Thurling and Greene [19] gave a detailed description of the composition of the delay of a low speed unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remotely piloted system and analyzed the result of time delay impacting on the handling qualities; they described how the greater time delay could cause the pilot to over-operate the UAV and even lead to UAV instability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth mentioning that the existing error between the exact and the approximated predictions in a disturbed system cannot be removed, even in case of time-constant disturbances using integral action [34]. To overcome this limitation, predictor-feedback approaches were recently combined with Extended State Observer (ESO) to actively reject external disturbances in the presence of time-constant delays [25,17], and further extended to timevarying delays [14]. These last works considered disturbances that affect the state through channels in which the input has no direct influence (mismatched disturbances), which are generally more difficult to handle for disturbance rejection purposes [3].…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the matrix inequalities (25) are not linear if the control and observer gains K and L are defined as LMI decision variables. Therefore, the problem of control synthesis by means of Theorem (1) or (28) renders non convex.…”
Section: Control Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation