2020
DOI: 10.1089/end.2020.0389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors Associated with a Prolonged Hospital Stay After Single-Port Extraperitoneal Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Comparative Analysis of Outpatient Versus Inpatient Care

Abstract: Purpose: To compare the perioperative characteristics of patients receiving outpatient vs inpatient care and to define predictors of inpatient care after single-port extraperitoneal robotic radical prostatectomy (RRP). Patients and Methods: Data on 120 patients who underwent single-port extraperitoneal RRP were collected and categorized into two groups: Group I (n = 98) included patients who received outpatient care (i.e. discharged on postoperative day 0) and Group II (n = 22) comprised patients with inpatien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were 8 studies that reported on complication rates among 822 SDD RARPs (range 0%–24%) and 1,881 IP RARPs (2%–28.2%), 4–6,10,12,18–20 and meta-analysis favored lower overall complication rate in the SDD group (RR: 0.7, 95% CI 0.5,0.9, p=0.02; see supplementary Figure, https://www.urologypracticejournal.com). However, there was no difference in risk of ≥grade 3 CD complications (RR: 0.4, 95% CI 0.2, 1.1, p=0.07), 90-day readmission rates (RR: 0.6, 95% CI 0.3, 1.1, p=0.10) or unscheduled emergency department visits (RR: 1.0, 95% CI 0.3, 3.1, p=0.97).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There were 8 studies that reported on complication rates among 822 SDD RARPs (range 0%–24%) and 1,881 IP RARPs (2%–28.2%), 4–6,10,12,18–20 and meta-analysis favored lower overall complication rate in the SDD group (RR: 0.7, 95% CI 0.5,0.9, p=0.02; see supplementary Figure, https://www.urologypracticejournal.com). However, there was no difference in risk of ≥grade 3 CD complications (RR: 0.4, 95% CI 0.2, 1.1, p=0.07), 90-day readmission rates (RR: 0.6, 95% CI 0.3, 1.1, p=0.10) or unscheduled emergency department visits (RR: 1.0, 95% CI 0.3, 3.1, p=0.97).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aminsharifi et al in 2020 found similar barriers of PONV in their cohort of patients who failed SDD, and point to the use of postoperative opioids as a risk factor (OR: 1.31, p¼0.005). 6 Many of these challenges would be mitigated by strict adherence to ERAS protocols, as well as implementing a prehabilitation program, similar to that of Ploussard et al in 2020, 25 for patients prior to SDD RARP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wilson et al previously validated the feasibility of an outpatient protocol for extraperitoneal (EP) SP-RALP [ 9 ]. Another retrospective study conducted at the same institution concluded that increased OR time and post-operative narcotic administration were factors significantly associated with increased likelihood of inpatient care following EP SP-RALP [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Originally, SDD RARP was offered to carefully selected patients, such as those with Grade Group 1 disease, however the addition of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) has not been shown to increase rates of complications. 4,5,11,12 Given the success observed internationally, we aimed to implement a SDD RARP protocol at a high-volume Canadian center.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%