2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2018.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of 30-day readmission following pancreatic surgery: A retrospective review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a French nationwide study of more than 22,000 patients, we observed that the rate of unplanned readmission after pancreatectomy was nearly 40% within 6 months. This finding is comparable to those of previous studies, wherein the readmission rate ranged from 15% to 38% 29,30 . Only a few studies have focused on the 6-month readmission rate and associated risk factors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In a French nationwide study of more than 22,000 patients, we observed that the rate of unplanned readmission after pancreatectomy was nearly 40% within 6 months. This finding is comparable to those of previous studies, wherein the readmission rate ranged from 15% to 38% 29,30 . Only a few studies have focused on the 6-month readmission rate and associated risk factors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…There have been various studies on unplanned readmissions in general surgical patients [456]. Recently studies have also been carried out to see readmission rates in patients undergoing urologic surgeries [789].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a separate study using the NISQIP dataset, Lyu et al similarly reported that complications such as the need for a transfusion and post-operative infection increased the likelihood of readmission. 3 In the current study, we noted that socioeconomic status was also associated with risk of readmission as patients covered by Medicaid and poor patients with no charge had higher risk of readmission. In addition, we noted that the actual causes of readmission were different between HQ and LQ hospitals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…3 As such, the actual burden of readmission has likely been underestimated in most previous studies. [2][3][4][17][18][19][20][21] The current study utilized the NRD, which allowed for the characterization of outcomes and cumulative costs of both the index and non-index readmission following pancreatic resection. Utilizing this large national readmission database, population level estimates were obtained that allowed for a more generalized assessment of hospital quality relative to readmission among hospitals in the United States.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation