2017
DOI: 10.1111/jth.13592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of active cancer thromboembolic outcomes: validation of the Khorana score among patients with lung cancer: reply

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…24 The Khorana score has been associated with higher likelihood of mortality in patients with cancer, but in our analysis none of the other variables within the score predicted 30-day mortality. 25 26 Our findings add to a recent publication in which the value of the Khorana score as a mortality predictor in patients with CT had limited performance (AUC, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.52–0.56). 27 Only 23% of the fatalities were among patients with high-risk Khorana score.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…24 The Khorana score has been associated with higher likelihood of mortality in patients with cancer, but in our analysis none of the other variables within the score predicted 30-day mortality. 25 26 Our findings add to a recent publication in which the value of the Khorana score as a mortality predictor in patients with CT had limited performance (AUC, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.52–0.56). 27 Only 23% of the fatalities were among patients with high-risk Khorana score.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Nonetheless, in a review of 719 patients, a high KRS was not associated with VTE compared to an intermediate score in both univariate and multivariable analyses. A high KRS, however, was a mortality predictor [9]. The patient in this case had a KRS of 1, placing him in an intermediate-risk group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15] была разработана для оценки риска ВТЭО у пациентов, которые проходят курс химиотерапии. Эффективность этой модели была подтверждена в исследовании Vienna CATS [16] и других [17,18], хотя последующие публикации ставили под сомнение воспроизводимость этой модели в некоторых популяциях пациентов [19][20][21].…”
Section: Conflict Of Interestunclassified