2020
DOI: 10.1352/1934-9556-58.3.192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of Annual and Early Separations Among Direct Support Professionals: National Core Indicators Staff Stability Survey

Abstract: Direct support professionals (DSPs) provide a broad range of supports in a variety of settings to people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) that enables people to live, work, and participate in their communities. Despite the crucial importance in ensuring supports for community participation of people with IDD, high rates of annual turnover among DSPs in organizations that employ them have been documented for decades. This study utilizes National Core Indicators Staff Stability data from 20… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Direct support professionals (DSPs) are often the primary source of support for individuals with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities (IDD) and their quality of life and serve as a valuable resource to organizations who provide services to the IDD population (Friedman, 2018; Houseworth et al, 2020; Keesler, 2020). The range of support they provide spans from ensuring individuals’ basic health, safety, and welfare needs; supporting the development of independent living skills; and supporting in-community integration and relationship building goals (Keesler, 2020; Nevill et al, 2022).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct support professionals (DSPs) are often the primary source of support for individuals with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities (IDD) and their quality of life and serve as a valuable resource to organizations who provide services to the IDD population (Friedman, 2018; Houseworth et al, 2020; Keesler, 2020). The range of support they provide spans from ensuring individuals’ basic health, safety, and welfare needs; supporting the development of independent living skills; and supporting in-community integration and relationship building goals (Keesler, 2020; Nevill et al, 2022).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible explanation for the presence of institutional practices like block treatment in community living settings may be carryover by former institutional staff of previous institutional working methods. However, the very high levels of staff turnover in US services (Houseworth et al, 2020) and the almost three decades since institutions were the major US residential provider (Lakin & Stancliffe, 2007) both suggest that few current community staff formerly worked in institutions. Therefore, it is unlikely that staff had applied to community‐living settings practices they had previously learned in an institution, but instead that block treatment is a persistent feature of the culture of some community‐living settings reflecting the staff‐centred way they currently function (Bigby, Knox, et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common data sources were the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) 22,[30][31][32][33][34] and Census sources including the Current Population Survey (CPS), 12,26 Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), 24,35 and American Time Use Survey (ATUS). 15,36 Additional data sources include the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), 27,[37][38][39] National Core Indicators (NCI), 40,41 the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), 16,21,42 and The Shift Project. 25,29 Ten other panel data sources were used 16,19,20,26,28,[43][44][45][46][47] along with 12 unique data sets collected independently by the study's authors.…”
Section: As Illustrated Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,18,23,48,49 Fourteen of the studies included the passage of a state or local mandate as a stimulus for studying associations with PSL. 12,15,16,[19][20][21][23][24][25][26][27][28]35,42 Outcomes were measured in terms of the individual unit of analysis except for eight studies that used the organization 16,23,24,40,41,44,47,48 and seven studies considered the region as the unit of analysis. 12,[19][20][21]26,28,35 The following is a focused discussion of study findings with regard to the specific proximal and distal business variables.…”
Section: As Illustrated Inmentioning
confidence: 99%