2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.01.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator skill retention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most studies investigating knowledge and skill retention find variable levels of decline over different time frames, which is often explained by the inability to control relevant variables that could impact on the longer term results, such as levels of prior knowledge, proficiency of precourse skills, clinical experience and encountering relevant situations in the workplace. [25][26][27] Again, it is crucial to reinforce the benefits of short courses through continuing clinical experience 28 as repetition promotes skill retention, 29 and where opportunities to manage rare clinical situations are limited, access to in-house training should be mandatory to maintain skills.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies investigating knowledge and skill retention find variable levels of decline over different time frames, which is often explained by the inability to control relevant variables that could impact on the longer term results, such as levels of prior knowledge, proficiency of precourse skills, clinical experience and encountering relevant situations in the workplace. [25][26][27] Again, it is crucial to reinforce the benefits of short courses through continuing clinical experience 28 as repetition promotes skill retention, 29 and where opportunities to manage rare clinical situations are limited, access to in-house training should be mandatory to maintain skills.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are consistent with a previous analysis of PAD volunteer performance at the primary refresher training session. 35 It must be emphasized that the volunteer cohort in this trial was motivated, had responsibility for responding during specific hours and worked in an environment of relative high risk; conditions that likely increased learning and retention. Some also had experience responding to emergencies (first aid attendants, security guards, lifeguards) and are not directly comparable to lay groups in many previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But retention of the skills, when used infrequently and in an emergency setting, has been an ongoing concern for lay-rescuer training. In the PAD trial, skill retention for both CPR and AED use was assessed among the volunteer laypersons [14,15]. Even 12-17 months after initial training, 70-80% of rescuers were judged to perform CPR adequately during a simulated resuscitation, whereas 80-90% were able to operate an AED adequately.…”
Section: Quality Of Cpr and Skill Retentionmentioning
confidence: 99%