2023
DOI: 10.29333/iji.2023.1622a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of Chemistry Learning Among First Year University Students

Abstract: Early diagnosis of prevailing factors that either promote or impede learning is necessary in order to minimize problems in chemistry instruction and overall student performance. Extracted from reports on various factors affecting the teaching and learning of Chemistry, this study draws out determinants that affect first year university students' achievement in chemistry courses. Using descriptivecorrelational research, university students (n= 253) were surveyed using a checklist instrument (CKI = 0.70) to dete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current findings show that both the localized litmus paper and the computer interactive simulator can be utilized, as there is no significant difference between the post-test results of the two groups of respondents. These findings strengthen the results gathered by Mangubat and Picardal (2023), which revealed that practical laboratory experiments can increase students' performance in chemistry. Similarly, the study conducted by Yucor (2018), Cabuyoc (2020) and Joharaj Acabal et al (2022) revealed no differences in learning between the different groups of students after being subjected to localized apparatus and interactive simulation as interventions in mathematics, biology, and physics lessons.…”
Section: Difference Between the Post-test Performances Of The Two Gro...supporting
confidence: 89%
“…The current findings show that both the localized litmus paper and the computer interactive simulator can be utilized, as there is no significant difference between the post-test results of the two groups of respondents. These findings strengthen the results gathered by Mangubat and Picardal (2023), which revealed that practical laboratory experiments can increase students' performance in chemistry. Similarly, the study conducted by Yucor (2018), Cabuyoc (2020) and Joharaj Acabal et al (2022) revealed no differences in learning between the different groups of students after being subjected to localized apparatus and interactive simulation as interventions in mathematics, biology, and physics lessons.…”
Section: Difference Between the Post-test Performances Of The Two Gro...supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Through communication, students can converse with their teachers and peers to improve their understanding of chemistry, enhancing their level of thinking. Mangubat and Picardal (2023) emphasized that a supportive learning environment and other motivational factors can help underprepared students succeed academically, even in the most challenging course like chemistry.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teachers often feel underprepared and uncomfortable teaching biotechnology, leading to limited time spent on these topics (Mueller et al, 2015). Following Mangubat and Picardal's (2023) recommendations, funding for books, glassware, heating tools, fire extinguishers, and other chemistry teaching supplies should be given top priority to protect students during experiments. This recommendation is relevant to experiments involving biotechnology.…”
Section: Lack Of Physical Resources/facilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%