2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of Death during Tuberculosis Treatment in TB/HIV Co-Infected Patients in Malaysia

Abstract: BackgroundMortality among TB/HIV co-infected patients is still high particularly in developing countries. This study aimed to determine the predictors of death in TB/HIV co-infected patients during TB treatment.MethodsWe reviewed medical records at the time of TB diagnosis and subsequent follow-up of all newly registered TB patients with HIV co-infection at TB clinics in the Institute of Respiratory Medicine and three public hospitals in the Klang Valley between January 2010 and September 2010. We reviewed the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

17
33
1
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
17
33
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…A Malaysian study involving HIV/TB patients looked further into the association of types of tuberculosis with mortality. When compared to extrapulmonary TB both smear positive pulmonary TB and smear negative pulmonary TB were not prognostic for a higher mortality [24]. The same result was reported in a study in Myanmar reporting that pulmonary TB was not found to be a predictor for death based on multiple Cox proportional hazards regression [22].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…A Malaysian study involving HIV/TB patients looked further into the association of types of tuberculosis with mortality. When compared to extrapulmonary TB both smear positive pulmonary TB and smear negative pulmonary TB were not prognostic for a higher mortality [24]. The same result was reported in a study in Myanmar reporting that pulmonary TB was not found to be a predictor for death based on multiple Cox proportional hazards regression [22].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…There are reports for and against an association between diabetes and drug-resistant tuberculosis (Dooley and Chaisson 2009), with possible explanations including delayed clearance resulting in routine switching to a twodrug regimen in patients who are still culturepositive or lowered rifampicin levels in diabetes patients (Nijland et al 2006). Among TB patients, having diabetes is linked with a significant increase in the risk of death Ismail and Bulgiba 2013). Very little of the available data comes from sub-Saharan African populations, where diabetes prevalence will increase over the next decade (Dooley and Chaisson 2009) and where TB and diabetes treatment decisions for significant numbers of patients will have to frequently accommodate antiretroviral therapy, which itself is associated with increased risk of TB (Marais et al 2013).…”
Section: Diabetesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will be interesting, in future, to compare TReAT with each of these scores and analyse their relative performance and applicability to different settings. In the present work, the fatal outcome was determined until 6 months after diagnosis, which is supported by several studies, including clinical trials [29][30][31], and contemplates the minimum duration of the standard multidrug treatment. Late mortality related to TB was previously described to stabilize after 6-months of treatment [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In the present work, the fatal outcome was determined until 6 months after diagnosis, which is supported by several studies, including clinical trials [29][30][31], and contemplates the minimum duration of the standard multidrug treatment. Late mortality related to TB was previously described to stabilize after 6-months of treatment [30]. Nevertheless, patients died more frequently during the first 30 days after diagnosis, which did not appear to be related with diagnostic delay, since fatal cases usually had shorter time of symptoms compared to survivors (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%