2019
DOI: 10.1080/23311908.2019.1608031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of distress in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, only repetitive negative thinking, "negative" maladaptive metacognitive beliefs about the danger, and uncontrollability of worry and "positive" maladaptive metacognitive beliefs about worry made significant contributions to the final model. This supports previous research indicating that maladaptive metacognitive beliefs are associated with emotional distress in individuals with physical health difficulties (Brown and Fernie, 2015;Cook et al, 2015a,b;Fisher and Noble, 2017;Heffer-Rahn and Fisher, 2018;Purewal and Fisher, 2018) and reflects previous findings that physical functioning, time since diagnosis, and demographic factors are inconsistent predictors of emotional distress in people with ALS (De groot et al, 2007;Gauthier et al, 2007;Cupp et al, 2011;Matuz et al, 2015;Fisher et al, 2019b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, only repetitive negative thinking, "negative" maladaptive metacognitive beliefs about the danger, and uncontrollability of worry and "positive" maladaptive metacognitive beliefs about worry made significant contributions to the final model. This supports previous research indicating that maladaptive metacognitive beliefs are associated with emotional distress in individuals with physical health difficulties (Brown and Fernie, 2015;Cook et al, 2015a,b;Fisher and Noble, 2017;Heffer-Rahn and Fisher, 2018;Purewal and Fisher, 2018) and reflects previous findings that physical functioning, time since diagnosis, and demographic factors are inconsistent predictors of emotional distress in people with ALS (De groot et al, 2007;Gauthier et al, 2007;Cupp et al, 2011;Matuz et al, 2015;Fisher et al, 2019b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…There is growing support for the clinical applicability of the S-REF model to emotional distress in physical health conditions (Capobianco et al, 2020)-specifically, for people with cancer (Butow et al, 2015;Cook et al, 2015a,b), diabetes (Purewal and Fisher, 2018), epilepsy (Fisher and Noble, 2017;Fisher et al, 2018), multiple sclerosis (Heffer-Rahn and Fisher, 2018), chronic fatigue syndrome (Maher-Edwards et al, 2011), fibromyalgia (Kollmann et al, 2016), cardiovascular disease (Anderson et al, 2019), and Parkinson's disease (Brown and Fernie, 2015). Preliminary evidence indicates that MCT may be an effective and tolerable intervention for adults with physical health difficulties (Cherry et al, 2019;Fisher et al, 2019b;McPhillips et al, 2019). However, the utility of the S-REF model in understanding emotional distress in people with ALS has not been studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Affective ToM abilities, i.e., those considered in our review, seem to be associated with "mental health" quality of life [40]. Moreover, a recent review about predictors of distress in ALS showed that the only relevant factor is represented by lower levels of perceived social support [68]. Since the ability to adequately experience, recognize and respond to emotional stimuli is a constitutive aspect of social relationships, the assessment and management of emotional abilities alterations is very important for maintaining positive and supportive interpersonal exchanges.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…decreased intimacy, increased conflict). [5][6][7] Early adjustment challenges are important to address because of the following:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Distinct from other chronic illnesses, dyads with NDDs cope with a combination of progressive cognitive, behavioral, and/or socio-emotional changes that can impact their identity and relationships. 5,6,[11][12][13] Individuals with NDDs may lack insight into their symptoms, deny the diagnosis, or avoid conversations about the future. 11,12 Care partners may feel a responsibility to ensure that their partner engages with care, accepts the diagnosis, and plans for the future.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%