2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10826-017-0799-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of Emotional Security in Survivors of Interpersonal Violence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Disengagement subscale (7 items; e.g., “When I’m upset, there’s no one in my family who can make me feel better”) indexes the person’s efforts to disengage from and minimize the significance of the family. SIFS subscales have demonstrated strong psychometric properties in previous studies (Forman & Davies, 2005; Jobe-Shields et al, 2017). In this sample, Cronbach’s αs were .82 for preoccupation, .84 for security, and .78 for disengagement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The Disengagement subscale (7 items; e.g., “When I’m upset, there’s no one in my family who can make me feel better”) indexes the person’s efforts to disengage from and minimize the significance of the family. SIFS subscales have demonstrated strong psychometric properties in previous studies (Forman & Davies, 2005; Jobe-Shields et al, 2017). In this sample, Cronbach’s αs were .82 for preoccupation, .84 for security, and .78 for disengagement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Participants completed the Security in the Family System (SIFS) Scale (Forman & Davies, 2005). Originally designed to index children’s emotional security about their family, the SIFS has been extended to adolescent (Cummings et al, 2015) and young adult (Jobe-Shields et al, 2017) samples. The 22-item self-report scale was designed to capture the individual’s perceptions of their family as a source of security, safety, and protection.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As discussed before, perceived stress may be deemed a risk factor (Dean & Lawrence, 1983;Gomes, Faria, & Lopes, 2016) for developing a sense of insecurity (Kong, 2010) while ecological resource factors may buffer or weaken the adverse impact of risk factors (Li, 2012). Thus, it may be inferred that family cohesion, as a protective factor (Coe et al, 2017;Jobe-Shields et al, 2017), may buffer against the risk of perceive stress and also increase sense of security. Specifically, college students who believe their family cohesion to be strong may be report a weaker relation between perceived stress and sense of security, and vice versa.…”
Section: Family Cohesion As a Moderatormentioning
confidence: 99%