2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of foster youths’ participation in their transitional independent living plan (TILP) development: Calling for collaborative case plan decision-making processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as our results also suggest, simply hiring more specialized caseworkers or changing caseworker perspectives may not be sufficient for improving education and employment outcomes. These outcomes are likely influenced by a host of youth characteristics, institutional characteristics, other county attributes (e.g., the quality of independent living services and inter-system collaboration qualities), and how specialized caseworkers and youth collaborate in planning (Park et al, 2020). Future qualitative, longitudinal, and evaluation research should explore if and how a service delivery approach using specialized caseworkers can improve youth outcomes in the context of EFC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, as our results also suggest, simply hiring more specialized caseworkers or changing caseworker perspectives may not be sufficient for improving education and employment outcomes. These outcomes are likely influenced by a host of youth characteristics, institutional characteristics, other county attributes (e.g., the quality of independent living services and inter-system collaboration qualities), and how specialized caseworkers and youth collaborate in planning (Park et al, 2020). Future qualitative, longitudinal, and evaluation research should explore if and how a service delivery approach using specialized caseworkers can improve youth outcomes in the context of EFC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few studies have examined the influence of EFC policy and county-level factors on youths’ EFC participation. Okpych et al, 2020; Park et al, 2020a, 2020b found that California’s implementation of EFC policy increased the amount of time youth stayed in care past their 18th birthday by about 15 months. The same study showed that youths’ time in EFC varied up to six months based on their placement county, suggesting county-level attributes’ influence on the amount of time youth stayed in EFC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings may speak to both individual challenges and systemic barriers, such as racism and inequality in access to services, employment, and postsecondary education. Community-based programs that focus on rehabilitation rather than punishment are needed for youth involved with the criminal justice system (Park et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…St John and Akama, 2022, pp 22-23. Törrönen and Vornanen, 2014Lushey and Munro, 2015;Kelly et al, 2016;Dixon et al, 2019;Glynn and Mayock, 2019;Munro, 2019;Kelly et al, 2020aKelly et al, , 2020bPark et al, 2020Hoffman-Cooper, 2021;Lynch et al, 2021;Cullingworth et al, 2022;Kulmala and Fomina, 2022;Mendes et al, 2022;Alderson et al, 2023;Blakeslee et al, 2023;Krakouer, 2023. See also McTavish et al, 2022.…”
Section: Acknowledgements VIImentioning
confidence: 99%