2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmr.2015.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of Functional Outcome Following Stroke

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
59
0
10

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
6
59
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Predictor of functional outcome Consistent with previous reports, we have found that the strongest predictor of functional outcomes following stroke is the age of the patient and stroke severity (17). We also found that thrombectomies and tme-to-treatment of the thrombectomy were significantly related to functional outcome; however, the application of thrombolytic's was not related to functional outcome.…”
Section: Prevalence Of Thrombectomiessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Predictor of functional outcome Consistent with previous reports, we have found that the strongest predictor of functional outcomes following stroke is the age of the patient and stroke severity (17). We also found that thrombectomies and tme-to-treatment of the thrombectomy were significantly related to functional outcome; however, the application of thrombolytic's was not related to functional outcome.…”
Section: Prevalence Of Thrombectomiessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This study found that initial stroke and aphasia severity were consistently the best factors to predict aphasia recovery. Furthermore, aphasia has been found to be associated with greater functional dependence as measured by the modified Rankin Scale [6]. This finding is consistent with the idea that residual comprehension deficits are associated with lower probability of a patient returning home after an IRU stay and with lower motor and cognitive scores on the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) [7].…”
Section: Case Scenariosupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Therefore, we included these factors in the subsequent stepwise hierarchical regression analyses. NIHSS and CST lesion load were also included, since both are well-known outcome predictors (Harvey, 2015;Kwakkel et al, 2010;Kwakkel and Kollen, 2013;Radlinska et al, 2010). Several significant models predicting ΔFIM, ΔLIMOS, and ΔLIMOS upper limb were identified (see Table 3).…”
Section: Clinical and Demographic Factors Predicting General Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%