2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.04.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of long-term stenosis in bicuspid aortic valve repair

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common reason for late reoperation was recurrent severe AR, in 3% of the entire study cohort (most occurred in TAV) followed by severe aortic stenosis at 2% (most occurred in BAV). Risk factors for aortic stenosis have been previously described in detail by our group (21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common reason for late reoperation was recurrent severe AR, in 3% of the entire study cohort (most occurred in TAV) followed by severe aortic stenosis at 2% (most occurred in BAV). Risk factors for aortic stenosis have been previously described in detail by our group (21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, data suggests that repair with patches or other techniques provides good outcomes (5). Leaflet thickening or retraction can be addressed by thinning, which will increase leaflet mobility and protect from long-term stenosis, particularly in BAV (6). In BAV, a gH of 20 mm is a good parameter to predict repair success.…”
Section: Valve-relatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the selective annuloplasty, the larger fused cusp sinus is reduced to an equal size to the originally smaller not fused sinus. Not only does the more mobile non-fused cusp now cover a relatively larger valve orifice area, but decreasing the fused cusp sinus, allows for direct closure of the line of fusion, preserving fused cusp mobility and obviating the need for pericardial patch extension, which has been associated with valve stenosis later ( 44 ). Long-term results with this technique are excellent and have previously been reported to restore normal life expectancy with a 97% 12-year survival and 91% 12-year freedom from AR > grade 2 ( 14 ).…”
Section: Bicuspid Aortic Valve Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%