2023
DOI: 10.1161/circimaging.123.015475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Moderate Aortic Stenosis: Implications for Aortic Valve Replacement

Abstract: Background: Although the prognosis and management of severe aortic stenosis has been extensively studied, the risk stratification and outcomes of patients with moderate aortic stenosis remain elusive. Methods: This study included 674 patients from the Cleveland Clinic Health System with moderate aortic stenosis (aortic valve area, 1–1.5 cm 2 ; mean gradient, 20–40 mm Hg; and peak velocity <4 m/s) and an NT-p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A specification of handling the latter generally lacks in research, though is pivotal to give risk estimates a clinical meaning, for example, when analyzing components of a composite end point. We support this using examples from Howard et al 1 and suggest potentially interesting extensions.…”
Section: To the Editorsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A specification of handling the latter generally lacks in research, though is pivotal to give risk estimates a clinical meaning, for example, when analyzing components of a composite end point. We support this using examples from Howard et al 1 and suggest potentially interesting extensions.…”
Section: To the Editorsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…We congratulate Howard and colleagues 1 with their important contribution to current knowledge on the prognosis of moderate aortic stenosis regarding major adverse cardiovascular events. They analyzed predictors and estimated the cumulative incidence of the composite end point major adverse cardiovascular event but also investigated its components.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 95%
“…11,30,31 However, a challenge in personalizing patient follow-up is the marked variability in the progression rates of patients within similar Doppler-adjudicated severity stages. [32][33][34][35] Traditional risk factors, such as hypercholesterolemia, smoking, kidney dysfunction, and elevated natriuretic peptide levels, lack specificity for AS, 15,36 while alternative Doppler-derived indices require skilled acquisition and modifications to the scanning protocols. 36,37 Deep learning-enhanced, 2-dimensional echocardiography with DASSi aims to bridge this gap by providing a Dopplerindependent AS severity metric that can be computed from any portable or standard echocardiogram.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32][33][34][35] Traditional risk factors, such as hypercholesterolemia, smoking, kidney dysfunction, and elevated natriuretic peptide levels, lack specificity for AS, 15,36 while alternative Doppler-derived indices require skilled acquisition and modifications to the scanning protocols. 36,37 Deep learning-enhanced, 2-dimensional echocardiography with DASSi aims to bridge this gap by providing a Dopplerindependent AS severity metric that can be computed from any portable or standard echocardiogram. Trained to detect generalizable features associated with the severe AS phenotype, 16 DASSi maintains its prognostic value across the spectrum of AS stages, identifying individuals who do not meet traditional criteria for severe AS, yet exhibit fast rates of progression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is paramount to acknowledge the inherent limitations associated with drawing causal inference conclusions from observational cohort data. In light of this, we approached our presented retrospective cohort study 3 with judiciousness, opting not to explicitly test hypotheses pertaining to treatment effects. Instead, we underscored the importance of our findings in guiding the design of future randomized controlled trials.…”
Section: In Responsementioning
confidence: 99%