2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.01.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of massive blood loss in women with placenta accreta

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
76
1
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
76
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…69 Similarly, the median number of units of blood transfused is five 69 and many women require multiple units of blood and other blood products. [69][70][71][72][73] In a series of 76 cases from Utah, 28% had disseminated intravascular coagulation. 70 Maternal morbidity is common and 25-50% of patients are admitted to an intensive care unit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…69 Similarly, the median number of units of blood transfused is five 69 and many women require multiple units of blood and other blood products. [69][70][71][72][73] In a series of 76 cases from Utah, 28% had disseminated intravascular coagulation. 70 Maternal morbidity is common and 25-50% of patients are admitted to an intensive care unit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As much as 30 %, and in some countries more than 50 % of maternal mortality, is due to hemorrhage, primarily in the postpartum period [2][3][4]. The challenge of identifying and reducing risk factors for major obstetric hemorrhage is also relevant in developed countries where these events are increasingly seen [5][6][7], especially because of complications of overinvasive placentation and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) [8][9][10][11][12].Real-time assessment and/or quantification of blood loss perinatally is notoriously difficult to assess leading to underestimation of the amount of maternal blood loss [13]; therefore, for this analysis it was decided to circumscribe the study population to women with no co-morbidities (e.g., pre-existing maternal anemia) posing potentially catastrophic outcomes and to specify transfusion of C5 packed red blood cells (pRBC) units at birth.Our purpose was to identify the incidence of major obstetric hemorrhage and revisit clinical and peripartum obstetric risk factors, both modifiable and non-modifiable, for major obstetric hemorrhage, and assess related neonatal outcome. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As much as 30 %, and in some countries more than 50 % of maternal mortality, is due to hemorrhage, primarily in the postpartum period [2][3][4]. The challenge of identifying and reducing risk factors for major obstetric hemorrhage is also relevant in developed countries where these events are increasingly seen [5][6][7], especially because of complications of overinvasive placentation and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) [8][9][10][11][12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26,27 Also, Guleria, et al concluded that; risk factors of AIP (abnormal invasive placentation) were placenta previa and previous cesarean delivery, and Thia, et al concluded that depth of invasion in MAP is increased with multiple previous surgery or excessive curettage or infection causing defective decidua basalis. 28,29 D'Antonio, et al concluded that; incidence of AIP increased in past decades due to increasing caesarean section rates and ultrasound has 91% sensitivity and 97% specificity for prediction of all forms of AIP.…”
Section: 23-25mentioning
confidence: 99%