2021
DOI: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of Metachronous Risk Polyps After Index Colonoscopy

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Guidelines for surveillance after polypectomy are lacking in strong evidence. Our aim was to identify some precursors of colorectal cancer lesions at 3 years after polypectomy to improve stratification and surveillance programs. METHODS: We included patients with high-risk lesions (HRLs), defined as advanced adenoma (AA), large serrated polyps (SPs), and multiplicity (≥3 of any adenomas/SPs). Data on age, sex, cardiovascular risk factors, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After adjusting for other factors, patients with multiple polyps (5 or more) had a higher risk of metachronous HR-CRN (OR 2.575). This result corresponds very well with that of a recent Spanish study, in which the presence of multiple polyps (3 or more adenomas and/or serrated polyps) was found to be a strong predictor of HR-CRN after index polypectomy [15]. The study also did not find any histological characteristics that increased the risk of metachronous HR-CRN.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…After adjusting for other factors, patients with multiple polyps (5 or more) had a higher risk of metachronous HR-CRN (OR 2.575). This result corresponds very well with that of a recent Spanish study, in which the presence of multiple polyps (3 or more adenomas and/or serrated polyps) was found to be a strong predictor of HR-CRN after index polypectomy [15]. The study also did not find any histological characteristics that increased the risk of metachronous HR-CRN.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…According to previous studies, the majority of guidelines put the age cutoff value at 50 years or older [19,20]. However, the incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer has been on the rise over the past four decades [21] and is expected to increase by >140% by 2030 [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 Seventh, the retrospective design also precludes a detailed analysis of the extent to which differential exposure to risk factors for polyp recurrence other than age, sex, and socioeconomic status may have influenced our results. 28,29 Lastly, we relied on the subjective judgment of multiple endoscopists to provide data about polyp size, thereby raising the possibility of misclassification for ACN defined by size alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%