2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajme.2014.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of mortality in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage who underwent endoscopy and confirmed to have variceal hemorrhage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 In this study, there was significant difference between the studied patients as regard blood pressure. Our findings agree with those of Gado et al, 11 and Jiménez et al 12 They found that hemodynamic instability at admission, Child class C, blood in GI tract at the index endoscopy, rebleeding within five days of endoscopy, and in-hospital complications were independent predictors of mortality.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10 In this study, there was significant difference between the studied patients as regard blood pressure. Our findings agree with those of Gado et al, 11 and Jiménez et al 12 They found that hemodynamic instability at admission, Child class C, blood in GI tract at the index endoscopy, rebleeding within five days of endoscopy, and in-hospital complications were independent predictors of mortality.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…15,16 We detected significant difference between the studied patients as regards MELD score, ROCKall score, and AIMS65 score. This finding was in agreement with Saltzman et al, 17 and Gado et al 11 This finding was in disagreement with Mohammad et al, 18 who reported the superiority of the SOFA score in mortality prediction when compared with the MELD, APACHEII, and CPT scores and concluded that independently the AIMS65 score was the simplest and most applicable scoring system for mortality prediction among cirrhosis patients suffering from acute variceal hemorrhage.…”
Section: Figsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Other studies found that 10 days and 2 weeks mortality rate were 11.5% [15] and 8% [22] respectively. Univariate analysis of clinical variables in this study showed that, hypovolemic shock, ascites, WBCs count, serum bilirubin, serum albumin, ALT, AST, CTP score and MELD score were risk factors associated with 6-week mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, overall 30-day mortality is 15%, the rebleeding rate is 26% and the 30-day mortality in those patients who do not rebleed is 7% (7,8). Mortality remains closely associated with failure to control bleeding or early rebleeding (6)(7)(8). As one of the most common and lethal complications of portal hypertension resulting from liver cirrhosis, esophagogastric variceal bleeding may lead to acute hemorrhage shock accompanied by other serious consequences, such as renal failure, infection and even death without timely treatment (9,10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, there are >12 million hepatitis B patients in China and liver cancer and cirrhosis leads to the mortality of 240,000 individuals every year (5). Variceal hemorrhage (VH) is a major and life-threatening complication of chronic liver disease and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality (6). However, the overall rate of survival may be improving with advances in medical technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%