2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2019.12.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of mortality of influenza virus infections in a Swiss Hospital during four influenza seasons: Role of quick sequential organ failure assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
17
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pneumonia on infection presentation was very frequent, in line with more recent reports [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17], revealing how an important proportion of patients showed a direct viral injury in lung parenchyma and/or bacterial co-infection. However, despite being a life-threatening condition, it was neither predictive of NIV use nor of IHD.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pneumonia on infection presentation was very frequent, in line with more recent reports [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17], revealing how an important proportion of patients showed a direct viral injury in lung parenchyma and/or bacterial co-infection. However, despite being a life-threatening condition, it was neither predictive of NIV use nor of IHD.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Overall, the number of hospitalizations over the study period was remarkable comparing to recent reports [9], showing that over two years one out of five admissions with influenza and/or RSV infections involved oldest-old. Moreover, in our study, hospital-acquired influenza and/or RSV infections were not identified as predictors of pneumonia, use of NIV, and IHD for patients aged 65 years and older, moving away from evidence available so far [9,10].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…24,25,26,27,28 We considered CURB-65 to be predictive of poor prognosis when three of the five variables (confusion, BUN >7 mmol/L, respiratory rate ≥30 bpm, systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≤60 mmHg, and age ≥65 years) were positive. 21,22,23,24 The MuLBSTA score is a newly designed score for viral pneumonia 11 points or more is related with poor prognosis, as defined in the original study. 11 qSOFA was considered positive when two of the three variables (altered mental status, respiratory rate ≥22 brpm, and/or systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg) were met, according to the Sepsis-3 definition.…”
Section: Study Design and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent works indicate that qSOFA is also a useful tool for identifying patients with poor prognoses in viral infections such as influenza. 20,21,22 In addition, qSOFA has shown good performance in predicting prognosis in pneumonia, both in the emergency department 23,24,25,26,27 and in wards. 28 The advantage of the qSOFA score is that the variables are clinical and thus laboratory tests are not required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, the risk of mechanical ventilation increased with higher score values for NEWS, CRB-65 and qSOFA. qSOFA has been proven a useful predictor of mortality among patients with suspected infection [9], mainly of bacterial aetiology [20], but also influenza [21,22]. We opted for including qSOFA in our final multivariate analysis, since it is widely used by clinicians in our institution, and is quick and easy to apply.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%