1988
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)64527-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of Operative Mortality in Critical Valvular Aortic Stenosis Presenting in Infancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1,2 LV volumes have and continue to be used as key determinants of suitability for 1-versus 2-ventricular repair. 3,4 To date, measurements have been based on 2D echocardiography, applying formulas that make inherent assumptions about LV geometry. However, in young pediatric patients with complex CHD, the LV is distorted and does not assume a typical ellipsoid shape, limiting the accuracy of 2D echocardiographic evaluation of mass and volumes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 LV volumes have and continue to be used as key determinants of suitability for 1-versus 2-ventricular repair. 3,4 To date, measurements have been based on 2D echocardiography, applying formulas that make inherent assumptions about LV geometry. However, in young pediatric patients with complex CHD, the LV is distorted and does not assume a typical ellipsoid shape, limiting the accuracy of 2D echocardiographic evaluation of mass and volumes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like other investigators, 5,9,10 we found several patients who survived a biventricular approach with LVEDV/BSA of 15 to 20 mL/m 2 , well below the reported threshold value for patients with critical aortic valve stenosis. 15 In addition to individual independent risk factors predictive of a failed biventricular approach, several combinations of lesions appeared to be predictive of poor outcome. For example, 80% of patients with a moderate/large VSD and LVEDV z-score ϽϪ2 were in the failed 2V group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This distinction is essential in deciding whether to proceed with a Norwood-type single ventricle repair or cardiac transplantation instead of valvotomy or valve replacement procedures. Previous reports have described significantly worse results in those patients requiring a "crossover" between univentricular and biventricular strategies [17,18].…”
Section: Valvar Aortic Stenosismentioning
confidence: 89%