Tendon adhesion to surrounding tissues after tendon repair, which is difficult to prevent in clinical practice, is the most common complication reported after tendon repair. [1] Thus, reducing the incidence of adhesion after tendon repair without affecting tendon healing has become a popular research focus. New surgical and rehabilitation techniques are improving the results while an unanimity for the best method has not been obtained. Tendon motion after tendon repair is important to avoid adhesions. Depending on the tendon repair strength, early passive or active flexion exercises may start immediately after the repair. Tendon gapping during or after the repair may deteriorate the results. The peripheral sutures serve to tidy up the repair site and prevent gapping. [2] However, a suture exposure due to complex peripheral suture may lead to adhesion formation and increase gliding resistance during early active motion. [3] Venting pulleys may also decrease the adhesion rate after flexor tendon repair. On the contrary to traditional knowledge about preserving A4 pulley, some authors recommend venting A4 pulley to Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the tenolysis rates of zone 2 flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) with flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) tendon repairs using four-strand technique and early passive motion exercises. Patients and methods: In this retrospective study, we performed zone 2 flexor tendon repairs in 149 patients (117 males, 32 females, mean age 33.3±12.9 years; range, 13 to 72 years) (82 right and 67 left hands) between November 2014 and January 2019. A total of 194 FDP and FDS tendons were repaired primarily by using modified Kessler and Bunnell methods. Patients underwent pure passive motion protocols after surgery according to modified Duran's protocol. No active flexion components were added until postoperative fourth week. Results: Twenty-three out of 149 patients and 28 out of 194 fingers (14.43%) had tenolysis. There was no significant relationship between the number of operated fingers, gender, and tenolysis rate (p=0.836, p=0.584, respectively). Conclusion: The repair of the FDP with FDS tendon increases the tenolysis rate in zone 2. The tenolysis rate does not change according to the number or distribution of injured fingers and gender of the patient.