“…A higher recurrence rate has been found with fl ap as compared to fi stulotomy [ 25 , 48 , 51 ], although one study found no difference in recurrence rate [ 13 ]. However, the problem with comparing these two methods, as acknowledged by many of the authors of these studies, is that endorectal advancement fl ap is generally used in situations where a fi stulotomy would be associated with an unacceptably high risk of incontinence, either due to the high location of the fi stula or due to preexisting impaired continence.…”