2001
DOI: 10.1080/000164701753542050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of outcome of floating knee injuries in adults: 89 patients followed for 2-12 years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
37
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In our experience, the outcome of the cases in type I floating knee was better (76.6% of good and excellent results) [12], while the outcome of the cases in type II was comparatively poor. Recent reports, using multivariate analysis, also claim that the outcome of type II floating knee is poorer than that of type I [10,16,17]. In this article, we have focused on the type II floating and analyzed the reasons of poor result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our experience, the outcome of the cases in type I floating knee was better (76.6% of good and excellent results) [12], while the outcome of the cases in type II was comparatively poor. Recent reports, using multivariate analysis, also claim that the outcome of type II floating knee is poorer than that of type I [10,16,17]. In this article, we have focused on the type II floating and analyzed the reasons of poor result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most healthy adults immobility associated with fracture healing does not significantly impact quality of life of the patient, but in elderly patients the period of convalescence required for fracture repair is a significant cause of post-trauma morbidity and mortality [12,20]. Although there is some disagreement [25], clinicians have suggested that advanced age might delay fracture healing [7,13], which could further hinder recovery in the elderly. Understanding how the potential of fracture repair changes with age will identify novel therapeutic targets that can be exploited to improve fracture healing in the elderly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time required for radiographic union following femoral fracture increases with age in rats, [5][6][7] mice, 8,9 and humans. [10][11][12][13][14][15] While young 6-week-old rats form bone to bridge the fracture gap by 4 weeks after fracture, adult 26-week-old rats require 10 weeks, and older 52-week-old rats need in excess of 26 weeks. 7 Despite this increased time to healing with age, there was no increase in the time of expression of Indian hedgehog or any of the bone morphogenetic proteins in the fracture callus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%