2007
DOI: 10.1097/01.mcg.0000225584.40212.fb
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of Outcomes After Biliary and Pancreatic Sphincterotomy for Sphincter of Oddi Dysfunction

Abstract: For the treatment of SOD incorporating pancreatic and biliary sphincterotomy, patient characteristics and pancreatic sphincter manometry may be more important predictors of outcome than the traditional classification based on liver chemistries and bile duct dilation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
2
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
4
19
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This dual classification has prompted a call for a single overall classification system from some quarters. A recently published trial [89] has also shown that other patient factors such as age, opioid use, delayed gastric emptying and pancreatic manometry are more important predictors of response to dual sphincterotomy than abnormal liver function tests and a dilated ductal system, on which the traditional classification system is heavily based. Further large prospective trials are required to identify other potential patient factors that may help predict response to therapy; such factors should be taken into account in any future overhaul of the current classification system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This dual classification has prompted a call for a single overall classification system from some quarters. A recently published trial [89] has also shown that other patient factors such as age, opioid use, delayed gastric emptying and pancreatic manometry are more important predictors of response to dual sphincterotomy than abnormal liver function tests and a dilated ductal system, on which the traditional classification system is heavily based. Further large prospective trials are required to identify other potential patient factors that may help predict response to therapy; such factors should be taken into account in any future overhaul of the current classification system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other factors should also be taken into account. In a recent trial which included patients with biliary typesⅠ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ SOD, all 121 patients underwent biliary sphincterotomy [89] and 49 patients had pancreatic sphincterotomy at initial or subsequent ERCP if there was a history of abnormal pancreatic manometry in the setting of continuous pain, persistent pain after biliary sphincterotomy or a history of amylase elevation. There was no significant difference in patient response according to Milwaukee classification.…”
Section: Pancreatic Type Sodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Freeman et al performed multivariate analysis to predict response to ES [53]. The group found gastroparesis, daily narcotic use and age less than 40 to be poor predictors of response.…”
Section: Long-term Outcomes Per Milwaukee Typementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Surgical sphincterotomy is usually reserved when endoscopic therapy is not available or for restenosis after endoscopic intervention. The outcomes of 18 studies reporting efficacy of sphincterotomy are shown in Table 6 [3,7,8,26,28,34,37,[46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53]. Follow-up ranged from a mean 3 months to 3.1 years.…”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It appears logical, but the evidence underlying it is thin and perhaps disappearing [7]. The definitions, as updated later, are as follows.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%