2001
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.161.8.1106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of Persistence of Use of the Novel Antidiabetic Agent Acarbose

Abstract: New users of acarbose showed low persistence in 2 cohorts of beneficiaries of Quebec's provincial health plan. Prescribing specialist was an important predictor of persistence in seniors and the socially assisted. The importance of 4 additional factors in seniors only led to hypotheses concerning population differences in treatment expectations and in the occurrence and tolerance of adverse effects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RESULTS -The systematic review was based on 20 reports that included quantitative information on adherence or persistence with diabetes medications (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30). The few studies that included laboratory data all showed HbA 1c levels Ͼ7%.…”
Section: Adherence Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RESULTS -The systematic review was based on 20 reports that included quantitative information on adherence or persistence with diabetes medications (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30). The few studies that included laboratory data all showed HbA 1c levels Ͼ7%.…”
Section: Adherence Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This database has been validated 13,14 and has been used in other studies. [15][16][17][18] From the medical services database we obtained data on physician visits; International Classification of Diseases (ninth revision, clinical modification [ICD-9-CM]) diagnosis codes; procedures performed; 19 the date of each visit; and information about the site of service. We obtained patient sex, date of birth, type of coverage and the date of death for deceased patients from the demographics database.…”
Section: Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other commonly used maximum allowed treatment gaps are 30 days (comparable to 0.33 times the theoretic duration), 45 days (comparable to 0.5 times the theoretic duration), 90 days which is comparable to one times the theoretic duration of a prescription and 180 days, which is comparable to two times the theoretic duration of a prescription. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Furthermore, we choose to study the extremes of three and four times the theoretic duration of a prescription (method 2) as well as 270 and 360 days (method 1).…”
Section: Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, different approaches are used to define persistence with drug use. A comparison of results of refill persistence studies is therefore complicated due to the variation of the methods [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. The aim of our study was to compare three different methods of calculating a 1-year refill persistence rate and associations between patient characteristics and 1-year persistence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%