2016
DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of persistent diarrhea in norovirus enteritis after solid organ transplantation

Abstract: Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients may develop protracted diarrheal illness from norovirus. We performed a retrospective chart review between January 2010 and April 2014 to identify predictors of persistent diarrhea in transplant recipients with norovirus enteritis. A total of 152 SOT recipients with mean age of 31.5 years (SD 23.1) were included: 43.4% male, 34.2% pediatric patients. Allograft types were abdominal 136 (89.5%) (kidney [39.5%], liver-small bowel [23%], other [27%]) and thoracic 16 (10.5%).… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
15
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Each individual patient was included only once, at the time of the first positive test. The patients included in this study were previously included in a previous analysis with a different focus—looking to identify predictor factors of persistent diarrhea in any transplant recipients with NVE . Variables collected included: age; gender; allograft(s) transplanted; induction therapy; maintenance immunosuppression regimen at the time of positive test; mean tacrolimus level during the month prior to diagnosis of NV infection; rejection episodes; graft loss during the follow‐up period; symptoms at the diagnosis and end of treatment (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, fever, weight loss); frequency of bowel movements; volume of stool; mortality; laboratory values at presentation and end of therapy (white blood cells [WBCs], creatinine and creatinine clearance; serum immunoglobulin G level); standard (intravenous [IV] hydration and anti‐motility agents) or experimental (nitazoxanide and IV immunoglobulin) treatment administered, dose and duration of treatment; route of immunoglobulin administration; enteral feeding; changes in immunosuppressive medications; and need for total parenteral nutrition (TPN).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each individual patient was included only once, at the time of the first positive test. The patients included in this study were previously included in a previous analysis with a different focus—looking to identify predictor factors of persistent diarrhea in any transplant recipients with NVE . Variables collected included: age; gender; allograft(s) transplanted; induction therapy; maintenance immunosuppression regimen at the time of positive test; mean tacrolimus level during the month prior to diagnosis of NV infection; rejection episodes; graft loss during the follow‐up period; symptoms at the diagnosis and end of treatment (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, fever, weight loss); frequency of bowel movements; volume of stool; mortality; laboratory values at presentation and end of therapy (white blood cells [WBCs], creatinine and creatinine clearance; serum immunoglobulin G level); standard (intravenous [IV] hydration and anti‐motility agents) or experimental (nitazoxanide and IV immunoglobulin) treatment administered, dose and duration of treatment; route of immunoglobulin administration; enteral feeding; changes in immunosuppressive medications; and need for total parenteral nutrition (TPN).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In immunocompromised patients, norovirus is increasingly acknowledged as a cause of chronic and/or severe gastroenteritis. This has been described in patients after solid organ transplantation [128][129][130][131] , and in patients with hematological malignancy 120 and primary immunodeficiency disorders [132][133][134] . There is limited knowledge of norovirus in the HSCT setting.…”
Section: Norovirus In the Immunocompromised Patientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment of chronic norovirus infection in immunocompromised host is not well established. Decreasing immunosuppression dosage, Nitazoxanide, IVIG, or oral immunoglobulin may be considered; although evidence of their effectiveness is limited, and further studies are necessary to determine optimal treatment [13,14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%