2005
DOI: 10.1177/0310057x0503300117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of Physician Confidence to Diagnose Pneumonia and Determine Illness Severity in Ventilated Patients. Australian and New Zealand Practice in Intensive Care (ANZPIC II)

Abstract: The manner in which elements of clinical history, physical examination and investigations influence subjectively assessed illness severity and outcome prediction is poorly understood. This study investigates the relationship between clinician and objectively assessed illness severity and the factors influencing clinician's diagnostic confidence and illness severity rating for ventilated patients with suspected pneumonia in the intensive care unit (ICU). A prospective study of fourteen ICUs included all ventila… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The selection process is displayed in Figure 1. Eleven of the included articles were prospective [3,4,9,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] and 8 were retrospective [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. The 19 included articles studied 7 models' performance in predicting mortality in VAP patients: 'The Acute Physiology and Chronic…”
Section: Literature Review and Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The selection process is displayed in Figure 1. Eleven of the included articles were prospective [3,4,9,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] and 8 were retrospective [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. The 19 included articles studied 7 models' performance in predicting mortality in VAP patients: 'The Acute Physiology and Chronic…”
Section: Literature Review and Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Health Evaluation II´ (APACHE II) [9,20,21,[24][25][26][27][28]31]; 'Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score' (CPIS) [20][21][22]28]; 'Immunodeficiency, Blood pressure, Multilobular infiltrates on chest radiograph, Platelets and hospitalization 10 days before onset of VAP' (IBMP-10) [24][25][26];'VAP Predisposition, Insult Response and Organ dysfunction´ (VAP PIRO) [9,27]; Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) [3,17,18,21,[29][30][31]; Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) [3,4,18,19,29,32] and 'The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III´ (APACHE III) score [23]. A summary of the models' variables can be seen in Table 1.…”
Section: Literature Review and Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the ability of the SOFA score to discriminate survivors from non‐survivors has been found to be inconsistent across studies [10, 11]. Although the SOFA scoring system has been used in some Australian ICUs [12], its performance in Australasian ICUs, especially in comparison with the APACHE II score, has not been evaluated. We have reported previously an alternative organ failure score, termed the Royal Perth Hospital Intensive Care Unit (RPHICU) organ failure score (Table 1) [13].…”
Section: Royal Perth Hospital Intensive Care Unit (Rphicu) Organ Faimentioning
confidence: 99%