2014
DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000000248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of Physician Performance on Competence Assessment

Abstract: Findings suggest that important predictors of physician performance on competence assessment include personal characteristics, practice context, and reasons for assessment referral. These findings have implications for development of policies and programs designed to assess risk of poor physician performance and quality of care improvement efforts through organizational/practice design or remedial education.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Like the emerging framework of PM [3,29,30], PE posits that the offer of educational services should reflect the specific content, timing, conciseness, ergonomics, and use channel needs at the point of use rather than the one-size-fits-all approach adopted so far [13,31,32]. In other words, PE involves identification of specific context-by-user information needs, optimization of educational activities, and design of user-centered learning [33,34]. In this context, medical information departments have the possibility to provide reliable medical content in a timely manner answering specific inquiries from specialists.…”
Section: Principal Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like the emerging framework of PM [3,29,30], PE posits that the offer of educational services should reflect the specific content, timing, conciseness, ergonomics, and use channel needs at the point of use rather than the one-size-fits-all approach adopted so far [13,31,32]. In other words, PE involves identification of specific context-by-user information needs, optimization of educational activities, and design of user-centered learning [33,34]. In this context, medical information departments have the possibility to provide reliable medical content in a timely manner answering specific inquiries from specialists.…”
Section: Principal Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An evidence synthesis in 20151 examined 17 primary studies looking at risk and support factors for quality clinical practices across three performance outcomes: complaints, disciplinary action and prescribing and testing errors. This synthesis, along with other published work, highlights several risk factors that are consistent predictors of poor performance across a variety of outcomes: gender,2–4 age4–6 and performance on medical examinations have consistently been shown to be risk factors of poor performance; workload,7 8 practising in a solo environment,9 and practice specialty3 10 have been studied less frequently but seem to pose some risk to poor performance; and being an internationally-trained medical graduate is inconsistently related to performance 10 11. A recent (2017) scoping review of literature regarding risk and support factors of competence for healthcare professionals12 revealed that the top four risk factors discussed in medicine were transitions in practice, being an international medical graduate, lack of clinical exposure and age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…14 Beyond clinical skills, physician performance is based on a combination of individual differences including specialty area, gender, and age. 15,16 Evidence suggests that biases against international medical graduates may lead to more complaints against physicians and disciplinary outcomes, 17 but ndings on biased physician performance evaluations are mixed. 18 Given the inconclusive evidence, having two examiners appears to mitigate potential sex or ethnic biases against physicians who are being evaluated based on their clinical performance.…”
Section: Multisource Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%