2016
DOI: 10.3109/00207454.2016.1152966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of poor outcome in patients with posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome

Abstract: Large prospective studies incorporating serial blood glucose values and advanced imaging studies are required to validate these findings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[18] One recent study reported mRS data, and found that 36% had a mRS score of 3–6, whereas 45% patients in our cohort had the same. [29]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[18] One recent study reported mRS data, and found that 36% had a mRS score of 3–6, whereas 45% patients in our cohort had the same. [29]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these and other studies on this topic have been hampered by limited scope of inclusion criteria and non- standardized measures of clinical outcome. [13, 20, 16, 15, 17, 2429…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent retrospective chart review, the authors found that pre-existing diabetes mellitus and corpus callosum involvement of PRES-associated lesions were strong predictors of poor outcome 55. Although the presence and degree of elevated blood pressure have been shown in many studies, these do not correlate with either the clinical outcome or MRI severity or grading of vasogenic oedema 3 7 10 56.…”
Section: Prognosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its clinical impact can be devastating and occasionally fatal [1]. Of described cases, it is estimated that greater than one third of patients will never regain baseline neurologic function [2]. Currently there are not any well-established treatment options for PRES [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%