2016
DOI: 10.1186/s13034-016-0098-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of rate of change for children and youth with emotional disorders: a naturalistic observational study

Abstract: BackgroundTo examine demographic and clinical characteristics as potential predictors of change for children and youth with emotional disorders treated at two child and adolescent mental health outpatient services (CAMHS) in Norway.MethodsThe study was of naturalistic observational type with “treatment as usual” (TAU). The sample consisted of 84 children and youth with emotional disorders. The Health of the Nation Outcome Scale (HONOSCA), and the Children’s Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) were administered at i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Seven studies were excluded because additional information was not provided by the corresponding authors on request. 28,29,[69][70][71][72][73] A total of 38 studies remained, relating to 44 independent study samples ( Figure 1).…”
Section: Search Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Seven studies were excluded because additional information was not provided by the corresponding authors on request. 28,29,[69][70][71][72][73] A total of 38 studies remained, relating to 44 independent study samples ( Figure 1).…”
Section: Search Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 There may be several person-and treatmentrelated variables that act as moderators, including but not limited to problem type, comorbidity, treatment length, and outcome informant. [28][29][30][31][32][33] Outcome moderation within this context warrants further investigation and is crucial for delineating the factors that may enhance or reduce clinical effectiveness in routine practice. This information may prove to be decisive in enabling clinicians to be prescriptive in their choice of treatment based on the likely outcome on an individual basis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even studies using exclusively diagnosed samples (d = 0.09) and studies on clinically referred youths (d = 0.17) showed low and non-significant ES values [34]. Despite the importance of quality assurance in routine practice, most CAMHS do not evaluate patients clinical change systematically [35]. A report from the Child and Outcomes Research Consortium (CORC) 2013-2016 with patients receiving treatment over six months in one of our participating CAMHS, showed improvement in many patients, however as many as 27% deteriorated [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turning to the clinic-based literature for potential guidance, there have been several studies examining predictors of clinic-based delivery of CBT for youth anxiety. However, reviews of the literature in this area have also failed to show a consistent pattern of results (Nilsen et al, 2016; Cook, 2014; Lundkvist-Houndoumadi et al, 2014; Walczak et al, 2018), and suggest that predictors of outcome for youth anxiety programs vary according to a range of factors, including the ways in which predictors and outcome are measured, the specific type of anxiety disorder, the content of treatment, the length of follow-up being examined, and the mode of treatment delivery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%