Predictors of receptivity to an alcohol intervention among mandated students

Carey, Kate B.; DiBello, Angelo M.; Orazio, Elora E.; Hatch, Melissa; Mastroleo, Nadine R.

doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106605

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In previous studies, a gender difference in university students' responsiveness to a brief intervention for excessive drinking has often not been found [8,9,22,34,53,54]. Nevertheless, within other samples the gender difference that we found is not without precedent.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 59%

Evaluating Two Brief Motivational Interventions for Excessive-Drinking University Students

Hogan,

Cox

2024

Behavioral Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Two brief computerized motivational interventions for excessive-drinking university students were evaluated. Method: Participants (N = 88, females = 61.5%, mean age = 21.05 years) were randomly assigned to a control group or one of two experimental groups: Computerized Brief Intervention (CBI) or Computerized Brief Intervention-Enhanced (CBI-E). CBI followed the principles of Motivational Interviewing to motivate participants to change their drinking behavior. CBI-E additionally used the principles of Systematic Motivational Counseling to identify and discuss with participants their dysfunctional motivational patterns that were interfering with their attainment of emotional satisfaction. At baseline and a three-month follow-up, the participants completed a battery of measures of alcohol consumption and related problems. Results: At baseline, the participants were confirmed to be heavy drinkers with many drink-related negative consequences. Males and females responded differently to the interventions. During follow-up, males’ alcohol use was ordered: CBI-E < CBI < Controls. The females in all three groups reduced their alcohol use, but there were no significant group differences. Conclusions: Males responded to the interventions as expected. For females, the assessment itself seemed to serve as an effective intervention, and there were no post-intervention differences among the three groups. Suggestions for future research using CBI and CBI-E are discussed.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 59%

Evaluating Two Brief Motivational Interventions for Excessive-Drinking University Students

Hogan,

Cox

2024

Behavioral Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Thus, the use of “gateway” interventions that may be appealing to EAs could be an important way to get a “foot in the door” with this population and potentially to enhance efficacy. Additionally, intervention approaches that address negative affect or coping, health behaviors such as sleep or exercise, alternatives to drinking, or parent communication may have important clinical or social benefits outside of alcohol prevention that may warrant their inclusion as part of more general wellness programs for EAs both in college settings and in workplace or community settings (Carey et al, 2021; Davis et al, 2017).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Beyond BASICS: A scoping review of novel intervention content to enhance the efficacy of brief alcohol interventions for emerging adults.

Murphy¹,

Gex²,

Dennhardt³

et al. 2022

Psychology of Addictive Behaviors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Brief motivational interventions (BMIs) that include personalized drinking feedback delivered in a motivational interviewing (MI) style have demonstrated reductions in drinking across numerous clinical trials with emerging adults (EAs) ages 18-25. However, effect sizes for these BMIs are generally small to moderate and drinking reductions are often not maintained beyond short-term follow-ups. Additionally, EAs may be more interested in approaches that highlight wellness, mood enhancement, or goal pursuit rather than programs focused exclusively on reducing alcohol-related risk. Thus, there is a need to evaluate novel intervention content as an alternative or supplement to BMIs in this high-risk population. Method: This scoping review examined studies of novel intervention elements to reduce alcohol consumption among EAs. Eligible studies were published in peer-reviewed journals in English from January 2015 to September 2021 and evaluated novel brief interventions, operationalized as one to five sessions focused on alcoholrelated outcomes with key content beyond what has typically been included in alcohol BMIs. Results were categorized as additions to BMIs or stand-alone interventions and were synthesized within these categories by theoretical approach. Results: Although standard in-person BMIs have the greatest empirical support, there are a variety of alternative intervention approaches that might enhance health and wellness and that can be feasibly integrated with BMIs or offered as an appealing "gateway" to increase help-seeking among EAs who drink alcohol. Conclusions: More research is needed to empirically evaluate both the relative efficacy of supplements and stand-alone alternatives to BMI among higher risk EAs and their potential for widespread dissemination. Public Health Significance StatementEmerging adults (EAs; ages 18-25) report greater alcohol use than any other age group, yet very few voluntarily participate in existing intervention programs, and those that do generally report only small to moderate reductions in drinking. This study reviewed novel intervention elements for EAs that have the potential to augment existing evidence-based brief motivational intervention approaches.

show abstract

“…IDR-16 has been used extensively in several studies to control or identify the possible tendency of subjects to perform response bias (Carey et al, 2021;Cash et al, 2004;Dunne et al, 2018;Grubb et al, 2015;Opoku et al, 2020;Ortner et al, 2018;Puthillam et al, 2021;Tong & Oh, 2021). For use in Indonesia, BIDR-16 has been adapted into Indonesian by involving 370 students (Mage=19.241, SDage= 0.870) (Setiawati et al, 2021).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Selecting Number of Factors of The Indonesian version of The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding Short Form (BIDR-16): Is it Two or Four-Factor?

Widyastuti,

Setiawati,

Darojat

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Socially desirable responding become a problem in research because of its impact in leading to inaccuracy in the result of measurements. BIDR-16 can be a measurement in minimizing the effect of socially desirable responding. Objective: The study aimed to test the internal structure of the Indonesian version of BIDR-16. Methods: A total of 1881 subjects consisting of 517 undergraduate students and 1364 adults were involved in this study. Confirmatory Factor Analysis was employed to test the structure factor model of the Indonesian version of BIDR-16. Results: This study found that the four-factor model of BIDR-16 is fitter than the two-factor model with a reverse item in Subscale SDE dan IM form separated factor. Conclusions: The Indonesia version of BIDR-16 has four dimensions, including SDE, SDE-R, IM, and IM-R. In using the Indonesian version of BIDR-16, researchers must consider this finding.

show abstract

Predictors of receptivity to an alcohol intervention among mandated students

Cited by 4 publications

References 36 publications

Evaluating Two Brief Motivational Interventions for Excessive-Drinking University Students

Evaluating Two Brief Motivational Interventions for Excessive-Drinking University Students

Beyond BASICS: A scoping review of novel intervention content to enhance the efficacy of brief alcohol interventions for emerging adults.

Selecting Number of Factors of The Indonesian version of The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding Short Form (BIDR-16): Is it Two or Four-Factor?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About