The Social Ecology of Resilience 2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-0586-3_33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of Resilient Psychosocial Functioning in Western Australian Aboriginal Young People Exposed to High Family-Level Risk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even if we make the assumption that it is possible to reduce resilience to a cognitive process, the environment/individual interaction (with the environment likely accounting for more of the variance in outcomes than individual factors such as cognitive style, intelligence, or personality) will influence the degree of successful coping that is achieved. For example, in a nonresponsive environment (e.g., chronic parental neglect) or a consistently oppressive environment (e.g., persistent racism), a positive appraisal may actually have the unintended consequence of undermining the experiencing of one's personal efficacy (Hopkins et al 2012;Obradovićet al 2010). After all, children who are racially marginalized but who make an unrealistically positive appraisal of their capacity to resist oppression may actually be ill-prepared to cope with the challenges they face.…”
Section: Michael Ungarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if we make the assumption that it is possible to reduce resilience to a cognitive process, the environment/individual interaction (with the environment likely accounting for more of the variance in outcomes than individual factors such as cognitive style, intelligence, or personality) will influence the degree of successful coping that is achieved. For example, in a nonresponsive environment (e.g., chronic parental neglect) or a consistently oppressive environment (e.g., persistent racism), a positive appraisal may actually have the unintended consequence of undermining the experiencing of one's personal efficacy (Hopkins et al 2012;Obradovićet al 2010). After all, children who are racially marginalized but who make an unrealistically positive appraisal of their capacity to resist oppression may actually be ill-prepared to cope with the challenges they face.…”
Section: Michael Ungarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Closing the educational gap between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal students is a complex task requiring sensitivity to a history of entrenched inequality (Ford, 2012). Previous research has illustrated that many expected resilience factors for Aboriginal youth were not significant (Hopkins, Taylor, D'Antoine, & Zubrick, 2012). Within the educational domain, we found school attendance was equally effective at promoting achievement outcomes for Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal students.…”
Section: Attendancementioning
confidence: 55%
“…Our results suggest that, for urban high family risk exposed Resilient youth, the protective influence of positive social connections afforded by living in low SES neighborhoods (inhabited by the majority of the Aboriginal population) may facilitate ready access to extended family support, in contrast to those youth living in higher SES neighborhoods. Aboriginal youth in upward socially mobile families may not only be exposed to actual discrimination but feel a very identifiable minority with attendant increase in stress [ 56 , 69 ]. Therefore, government policies aimed at facilitating upward socioeconomic mobility may unintentionally impose sufficient burden to lower individual adaptive functioning for Aboriginal youth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Family-level risk . Five risk factors were previously identified as specific predictors of increased likelihood of poor psychosocial functioning amongst Aboriginal youth [ 56 ]. The five measures comprise (a) low nurturing parenting; (b) harsh parenting ; (c) exposure to family violence ; (d) single parent household ; and (e) unemployed primary carer .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation