Predictors of Retention and Drug Use Among Patients With Opioid Use Disorder Transferred to a Specialty “Second Chance” Methadone Program

Abstract

Background: Many patients in methadone treatment have difficulty achieving or maintaining drug abstinence, and many clinics have policies that lead to discharging these patients. We designed a pilot “Second Chance” (SC) program for patients scheduled to be discharged from other local methadone clinics to be transferred to our clinic. Aim: Determine whether SC patients’ retention and opioid use is related to physical or mental health conditions, non-opioid substance use, or treatment features. Methods: From December 2012 to December 2014, this program enrolled 70 patients who were discharged from other clinics in the area; we were their last remaining option for methadone treatment. Unlike the clinic’s standard policies, the treatment focus for SC patients was retention rather than abstinence. This program focused on connection to care (eg, psychiatric services) and enabled patients to continue receiving services despite ongoing substance use. Each patient was assessed at treatment entry and followed until June 2016 to evaluate outcomes. Results: SC patients receiving disability benefits (n = 37) vs. non-disabled (n = 33) had significantly ( P < .05) higher rates of current DSM-IV Axis I psychiatric diagnosis (97% vs 70%), prescriptions for opioids (84% vs 55%) and benzodiazepines (65% vs 27%), and higher methadone doses at admission (58 vs 46 mg) but did not differ significantly in rates of 6-month or 1-year retention (77% and 56%, respectively) or all-drug use (39% positive urine drug screens). Methadone doses >65 mg predicted significantly longer retention and less opioid use, but these effects were not moderated by baseline characteristics. Conclusions: Patients in methadone treatment struggling to achieve abstinence may benefit from retention-oriented harm-reduction programs. Higher methadone doses can improve retention and opioid abstinence despite psychiatric comorbidities. Further work is needed to improve program implementation and outcomes in this complex population.

“They make it too hard and too many hoops to jump”: system and organizational barriers to drug treatment during epidemic rates of opioid overdose

“…Receiving higher doses of MOUD was also associated with better treatment retention, suggesting that some patients may not receive an adequate dose to control cravings [ 32 ]. In response to these poor rates of retention, some studies have implemented low-barrier MOUD treatment with softened rules focusing more on retention than abstinence; these have shown similar rates of retention as conventional MOUD treatment while engaging a higher risk population [ 33 , 34 ]. Future research to determine whether removal of such barriers improves longer-term retention are needed.…”