2016
DOI: 10.5137/1019-5149.jtn.17358-16.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predictors of track test performance in drivers with stroke

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, TMT-A can be regarded as an indicator that predicts the risk of violations or minor accidents. In contrast, a report by Kobayashi et al [22] that showed the importance of SDMT, cited the results of Track Tests, which were different from those discussed in the present study that examined violations and accidents. At present, there are no methods or clear criteria for objectively evaluating driving risk from the perspective of attention function [27], and further studies are needed.…”
Section: Attention Function and Driving Riskcontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As such, TMT-A can be regarded as an indicator that predicts the risk of violations or minor accidents. In contrast, a report by Kobayashi et al [22] that showed the importance of SDMT, cited the results of Track Tests, which were different from those discussed in the present study that examined violations and accidents. At present, there are no methods or clear criteria for objectively evaluating driving risk from the perspective of attention function [27], and further studies are needed.…”
Section: Attention Function and Driving Riskcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, the cutoff values were set to 54 s for TMT-A [21], 150 s for TMT-B [21], and 37.3% for SDMT [22]. In addition, to evaluate as many participants as possible while the "Health Checkup Project" was being held, the time limits for TMT-A and TMT-B were set to 90 s and 180 s respectively, and the evaluation was aborted if it was not completed within the time limit.…”
Section: Attention Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Stroke Driver Screening Assessment (SDSA) is a battery of four established subtests used to predict the driving ability of stroke survivors, and if all four subtest scores are above the cutoff value, the accuracy of predicting whether a person can drive is greater than 80%. 51) Since the Japanese version (J-SDSA) has become available, it has been used frequently in clinical settings in Japan. However, because it was not included in this study, it will be necessary to include SDSA as a predictor variable in future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers provide optimal cut-off points for TMT-A and TMT-B that can predict post-stroke unsafe driving, i.e., 32 s for TMT-A and 79 s for TMT-B [89]. The combination of TMT with other neuropsychological tests, such as the Snellgrove Maze Task [90], the Useful Field of View test for lane maintenance [91], the Symbol Digit Modalities Test [92], the Rapid Pace Walk test [93] and the Key Search Test of the BADS [34], provides additional data for the prediction of driving ability. Another variant of the TMT is the version in the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS; [94]).…”
Section: Tmt and Driving Abilitymentioning
confidence: 99%