2017
DOI: 10.1093/qmath/hax057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preduals of JBW*-triples are 1-Plichko spaces

Abstract: We prove that the predual, M * , of a JBW * -triple M is a 1-Plichko space (i.e. it admits a countably 1-norming Markushevich basis or, equivalently, it has a commutative 1-projectional skeleton), and obtain a natural description of the Σ-subspace of M . This generalizes and improves similar results for von Neumann algebras and JBW * -algebras. Consequently, dual spaces of JB * -triples also are 1-Plichko spaces. We also show that M * is weakly Lindelöf determined if and only if M is σ-finite if and only if M … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since α<κ (P α+1 − P α )X is linearly dense, we deduce that P * s x * = x * . (6)⇒ (7) Let (x * α , x α ) α∈Λ be the Markushevich basis provided by (6). It follows immediately that D is a Σ-subspace, thus it is weak * -countably closed by the already proved implication (1)⇒ (2).…”
Section: And Moreover For Anymentioning
confidence: 78%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Since α<κ (P α+1 − P α )X is linearly dense, we deduce that P * s x * = x * . (6)⇒ (7) Let (x * α , x α ) α∈Λ be the Markushevich basis provided by (6). It follows immediately that D is a Σ-subspace, thus it is weak * -countably closed by the already proved implication (1)⇒ (2).…”
Section: And Moreover For Anymentioning
confidence: 78%
“…(c) Assertion (6) can be strengthened by requiring that the Markushevich bases in question is moreover strong. The proof can be done by transfinite induction exactly in the same way as the proof of (5)⇒ (6). Indeed, separable spaces admit a strong Markushevich basis by [46] (see also [22,Theorem 1.36]) and this property is preserved in the induction step as remarked in the proof of [22, Theorem 5.1].…”
Section: And Moreover For Anymentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations