2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prefabricated nerve conduits advance histomorphological and functional outcomes in nerve regeneration of the sciatic nerve of the rat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CIVD was also observed to be recovered at 3 months post‐autologous nerve grafting, an observation time point at which nerve regeneration and repair outcomes were suitably achieved as indicated by many studies 27, 28. It is thought that a transected nerve can only recover its function partially, especially for motor nerve function,29–32 for example, muscle weight ratio was measured as about 75% and the recovery ratio of CMAP and CNAP amplitudes also about 75% in the current study; however, no significant differences in CIVD and pain sensation were detected between nerve autograft group and normal control at 3 or 6 months after autologous nerve grafting, which deserved further investigation. Additionally, Kusters et al10 reported that sham‐operated rats showed a larger CIVD in the operated paw when compared with the nonoperated one directly after operation; however, in the current study, no significant change in CIVD was observed immediately after sham injury, possibly due to different ways of cold stress disposition and different CIVD quantification approaches.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 44%
“…CIVD was also observed to be recovered at 3 months post‐autologous nerve grafting, an observation time point at which nerve regeneration and repair outcomes were suitably achieved as indicated by many studies 27, 28. It is thought that a transected nerve can only recover its function partially, especially for motor nerve function,29–32 for example, muscle weight ratio was measured as about 75% and the recovery ratio of CMAP and CNAP amplitudes also about 75% in the current study; however, no significant differences in CIVD and pain sensation were detected between nerve autograft group and normal control at 3 or 6 months after autologous nerve grafting, which deserved further investigation. Additionally, Kusters et al10 reported that sham‐operated rats showed a larger CIVD in the operated paw when compared with the nonoperated one directly after operation; however, in the current study, no significant change in CIVD was observed immediately after sham injury, possibly due to different ways of cold stress disposition and different CIVD quantification approaches.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 44%
“…These research data inspired us to use this method to substitute traditional epineurial neurorrhaphy for repairing peripheral nerve injury. Although many researchers had reported the good functional recovery after applying conduit to repair the nerve defect,9-11 we designed this method to repair peripheral nerve injury, not for nerve defect. After getting the Chinese Government SFDA permission and Peking University People's Hospital Ethics Committee, we applied biological conduit small gap (2mm) tubulization in human intending to confirm the possibility and feasibility of substituting traditional epineurial neurorrhaphy for repairing peripheral nerve injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%