Forty-One Facsimiles of Dated Christian Arabic Manuscripts 2012
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139169196.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the relative differences between the Adh genotypes in oxidation of propan-2-01 are somewhat greater than in ethanol elimination. This was found earlier in vitro (DAY, HILLIER and CLARKE 1974;LEWIS and GIBSON 1978;WINBERG, HOVIK and MCKINLEY-MCKEE 1985). The differences in elimination rates of ethanol between genotypes are found to be smaller than between their total ADH activities measured in vitro (DAY, HILLIER and CLARKE 1974;EISSES et al 1985a;EISSES 1986).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, the relative differences between the Adh genotypes in oxidation of propan-2-01 are somewhat greater than in ethanol elimination. This was found earlier in vitro (DAY, HILLIER and CLARKE 1974;LEWIS and GIBSON 1978;WINBERG, HOVIK and MCKINLEY-MCKEE 1985). The differences in elimination rates of ethanol between genotypes are found to be smaller than between their total ADH activities measured in vitro (DAY, HILLIER and CLARKE 1974;EISSES et al 1985a;EISSES 1986).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Previous studies have shown differences between their alcohol dehydrogenase allozymes (ADH, EC 1.1.1.1 .) with respect to in vivo quantity, total ADH activity in vitro, thermostability and kinetic-catalytic properties, respectively (THORIG, SCHOONE and SCHARLOO 1975;LEWIS and GIBSON 1978;MCDONALD, ANDERSON and SANTOS 1980;WINBERC, THATCHER and MCKINLEY-MCKEE 1982a,b;HOVIK, WINBERC and MCKINLEY-MCKEE 1984;EISSES et al 1985a;HEINSTRA et al 1986b). A major part of the difference in ADH quantity between AdhFiF and Adhsis flies can be explained by regulation of transcriptional activity (ANDERSON and MCDONALD 1983).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%