2012
DOI: 10.5565/rev/catjl.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preface. On Loanword Phonology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…14 En fonología se trata de una moneda de uso corriente; baste poner dos ejemplos. En japonés (Smith 2005) y en coreano (Kang 2003;Kenstowicz 2005) el mecanismo para evitar constituyentes silábicos complejos es la elisión en el vocabulario nativo, pero es la epéntesis en los préstamos. En español, la formación de pies trocaicos a partir de sustantivos nativos toma las dos primeras sílabas de la palabra (Prieto 1992) profesor > profe, película > peli, bicicleta > bici, mientras que a partir de préstamos nominales toma solamente la sílaba inicial agregando una sílaba proteica -cho: futbol > fucho, Volkswagen > vocho, hot dog > jocho.…”
Section: María Está Besando Al Duendeunclassified
“…14 En fonología se trata de una moneda de uso corriente; baste poner dos ejemplos. En japonés (Smith 2005) y en coreano (Kang 2003;Kenstowicz 2005) el mecanismo para evitar constituyentes silábicos complejos es la elisión en el vocabulario nativo, pero es la epéntesis en los préstamos. En español, la formación de pies trocaicos a partir de sustantivos nativos toma las dos primeras sílabas de la palabra (Prieto 1992) profesor > profe, película > peli, bicicleta > bici, mientras que a partir de préstamos nominales toma solamente la sílaba inicial agregando una sílaba proteica -cho: futbol > fucho, Volkswagen > vocho, hot dog > jocho.…”
Section: María Está Besando Al Duendeunclassified
“…Accordingly, an extensive line of research opted for constraint based framework to overcome the limitations of previous theories. Kenstowicz (2012) argued that with the advent of constraint-based frameworks like the Optimality Theory (OT), the study of loanwords from a phonological perspective has received a renewed interest. According to Kenstowicz (2012), OT theory helps explaining loanwords adaptation through the conflict between the faithfulness constraints which necessitate the segments to rest faithfull to the lending language, and the markedness constraints that impose adaptation to the loanwords so as to fit the phonotactic constraints of the recipient language.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other approaches allow a mixture of phonological and phonetic processing. One such model holds that loanword adaptation occurs at two distinct and ordered tiers (hence, multi-scansion), namely, Perceptual Level/perception grammar and Operative Level/production grammar (Silverman 1992, Yip 1993, Kenstowicz 2003, Broselow 2004). A fourth approach incorporates perception (perceptual similarity) into the production grammar (Steriade 2001; Yip 2002, 2006; Kang 2003, 2010; Adler 2006; Kenstowicz & Suchato 2006; Kenstowicz 2007; H. Kim 2008, 2009; Kenstowicz & Louriz 2009; K. Kim 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%