2016
DOI: 10.1177/1468796816638404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preference and prejudice: Does intermarriage erode negative ethno-racial attitudes between groups in Spain?

Abstract: This paper challenges the idea – rooted in classic assimilation theory – that intermarriage clearly erodes social and ethno-racial boundaries and negative attitudes between groups. Drawing on narratives from 58 immigrants of seven different origin countries residing in Catalonia, Spain, who are in romantic partnerships with Spanish-born people, we focus on preferences and prejudices related to mixing. We find that the members of exogamous couples both suffer social discrimination regarding the crossing of ethn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
22
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, social and family-related pressure still impacts partnering practices, including the choice of marrying outside group boundaries (Yahirun and Kroeger 2019). Given the enduring stigma of intermarrying (Rodríguez-García et al 2016), the often arduous relations with family and in-laws (McNamara et al 1999), or the general lack of social support (Bratter and King 2008;Kroeger and Williams 2011), exogamy might be ultimately experienced as more strenuous than endogamy. On the one hand, as they are more susceptible to the negative appraisal of their union (Van Mol and de Valk 2016), and have a greater geographical proximity to family and friends (particularly when compared to first generation migrants), we may expect a greater long-term negative effect of exogamy on SWB for German natives than for migrants.…”
Section: Adaptation Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, social and family-related pressure still impacts partnering practices, including the choice of marrying outside group boundaries (Yahirun and Kroeger 2019). Given the enduring stigma of intermarrying (Rodríguez-García et al 2016), the often arduous relations with family and in-laws (McNamara et al 1999), or the general lack of social support (Bratter and King 2008;Kroeger and Williams 2011), exogamy might be ultimately experienced as more strenuous than endogamy. On the one hand, as they are more susceptible to the negative appraisal of their union (Van Mol and de Valk 2016), and have a greater geographical proximity to family and friends (particularly when compared to first generation migrants), we may expect a greater long-term negative effect of exogamy on SWB for German natives than for migrants.…”
Section: Adaptation Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To these intercountry and intercultural tensions, the continual sociopolitical conflict during the Spanish protectorate in Morocco (1912Morocco ( -1958 can be added, as can the widespread suspicion of Muslim communities in the Western world since the 9/11 terrorist attacks (Ramberg 2004). Given this history, the fact of being Muslim or even just being from a Muslim-majority country becomes a negatively valued ethnoracial attribute in Spain and tends to elicit social distancing and discriminatory reactions from the mainstream society (see also Rodríguez-García et al 2018;and Rodríguez-García, Solana, and Lubbers 2016). Significantly, being of Moroccan nationality or heritage is usually conflated with being a Muslim in the Spanish context; 'Moroccan' becomes a signifier of Muslim 'otherness,' more so than for other less established Muslim immigrant groups such as Pakistanis or Senegalese.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En el espacio público se ha reconocido que las uniones mixtas difícilmente erosionan los estereotipos sociales cimentados a través de una larga historia de relaciones de poder y de subordinación. Esto ha sido analizado en contextos como el de España, donde las actitudes negativas y los prejuicios hacia grupos migrantes y sus elementos culturales (como la religión) se mantienen y se refuerzan, incluso bajo el auspicio de un matrimonio mixto (Rodríguez- García, 2016;Rodríguez-García et al, 2016;Rodríguez-García, 2015a). En este sentido, Rodríguez-García ha encontrado que algunas parejas sufren discriminación por parte de la sociedad y, al mismo tiempo, dentro de su propio círculo familiar, "regarding the crossing of ethnocultural borders; this rejection was based on negative stereotypes and prejudices linked to the partner's origin, phenotype (physical traits and appearance), or ethno-cultural characteristics, such a religion, especially Islam" (Rodríguez- García, 2015b: 15).…”
Section: Matrimonios Mixtos Integración Y Religiónunclassified