2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.swevo.2019.100602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preference-based cone contraction algorithms for interactive evolutionary multiple objective optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high performance of DE algorithm as one of the most powerful evolutionary algorithms has been proven in presence of dynamic constraints without getting stuck in local minima even in the time-variant problems. 41,42…”
Section: Adaptive Lane Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high performance of DE algorithm as one of the most powerful evolutionary algorithms has been proven in presence of dynamic constraints without getting stuck in local minima even in the time-variant problems. 41,42…”
Section: Adaptive Lane Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a pattern includes setting which generation to begin interaction, the interval of subsequent consultations, the total number of consultations, and the number of PWCs to present to the DM at each consultation. Each of these tasks is non-trivial and depends on the problem type and the desires [34] provides an outline of several common patterns, while [40] and [51] (for example), use specific methods to determine when to interact during optimisation. We adopt a simple approach, and use consultations evenly spaced throughout the optimisation run (determined by a fixed number of generations), and the number of PWCs used for each consultation is limited to a maximum of four (see Table 1 for experimental details).…”
Section: Integration With Multi-objective Optimisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, the geometric progression allows constructing elicitation intervals of a similar size, which is desired [1]. On the other hand, depending on when the first interaction is performed, the method may suitably shift the interactions toward the early or late stages of the optimization process, adapting in this way to the difficulty of the underlying Multiple Objective Optimization (MOO) problem.…”
Section: The Implementation Details Of the ℎ Questioning Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%