2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3027008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preference-Inspired Coevolutionary Algorithm Based on Differentiated Resource Allocation Strategy

Abstract: Preference-inspired co-evolutionary algorithms (PICEAs) consider the target vectors as the preferences, and then use the domination relationship between the candidate solutions and target vectors to increase their selection pressure. However, the size of dominating objective space varies with the different positions of candidate solutions and it leads to the imbalance of the evolutionary ability of whole population. To solve this problem, this paper proposes a preference-inspired coevolutionary algorithm based… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of simultaneous evolution of the candidate solutions regarding the preferences in practice is called preference inspired algorithms. The preference points used in these algorithms are randomly generated and are only used to increase the selection pressure of the candidate solutions [15]. Purshouse et al [14] presented preference-inspired evolutionary algorithms that used target objective vectors as preference solutions (PICEA).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of simultaneous evolution of the candidate solutions regarding the preferences in practice is called preference inspired algorithms. The preference points used in these algorithms are randomly generated and are only used to increase the selection pressure of the candidate solutions [15]. Purshouse et al [14] presented preference-inspired evolutionary algorithms that used target objective vectors as preference solutions (PICEA).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%