2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-45402-2_183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preference Measurement Using User Response Electroencephalogram

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A performance comparison between few selected published works and our results is tabulated in Table 5. Tough there have been better performances found in [17,18], our model is quite convenient in performance for such own recorded big database in consideration compared to their databases. As the dataset is diferent, comparison between our model and deep learning based models [19,20] is quite inconvenient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A performance comparison between few selected published works and our results is tabulated in Table 5. Tough there have been better performances found in [17,18], our model is quite convenient in performance for such own recorded big database in consideration compared to their databases. As the dataset is diferent, comparison between our model and deep learning based models [19,20] is quite inconvenient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fast Fourier transform (FFT) as the feature extraction method was used, and the SVM obtained an accuracy of 82.14% [48]. In another study, the researchers used the FFT with the radial SVMs for the preference classification and obtained an accuracy of 75.44% [49]. The last preference model combines time and frequency by analyzing the power spectrum at the time intervals that cover the entire duration of the post stimuli interval to assess the brain signals.…”
Section: Preference Classification Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emotion classification for the preference of music via preprocessed features obtained from a using a conventional Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) produced a classification accuracy rate of 85.7% using SVMs [16]. Radial SVMs were used in the only published emotion classification of preferences not using music stimuli, in this case for 2D image preferences using power spectrum analysis where the classification outcome produced an accuracy of 88.5% [17].…”
Section: Extraction Of Features From Eeg Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%