Debates on European Integration 2006
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-230-20933-6_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
277
0
33

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(314 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
277
0
33
Order By: Relevance
“…6 While the main debate has revolved around the relations between states and global capital, a parallel debate has concentrated on the altered position of the state in relation to competing political authorities, in particular international organizations. In the debate regarding the relations between competing political authorities, most scholars have maintained a skeptical view, relying on the neo-realist contention that international organizations do not and cannot impinge upon state sovereignty (Weiss 1999: 70-71;Moravscik 1993). Others, however, have suggested that the growth of supranational bodies diminished the decision-making abilities of member states (Slaughter 1997;Pierson and Leibfried 1995;Ross 1995;Held et al 1999).…”
Section: Institutions and State Powermentioning
confidence: 95%
“…6 While the main debate has revolved around the relations between states and global capital, a parallel debate has concentrated on the altered position of the state in relation to competing political authorities, in particular international organizations. In the debate regarding the relations between competing political authorities, most scholars have maintained a skeptical view, relying on the neo-realist contention that international organizations do not and cannot impinge upon state sovereignty (Weiss 1999: 70-71;Moravscik 1993). Others, however, have suggested that the growth of supranational bodies diminished the decision-making abilities of member states (Slaughter 1997;Pierson and Leibfried 1995;Ross 1995;Held et al 1999).…”
Section: Institutions and State Powermentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The other attempt is to conceive a security community analogous to the Council for Security Cooperation in Europe (CSCE) (now the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE)), upholding the basic logic of intergovernmentalism (Moravscik 1993). The tendency to draw on the European experience as a long-term reference point in this broader sense even predates the emergence of the North Korean nuclear crisis.…”
Section: The Eu: Model Setter or Norm Exportermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This argument is not groundless at all, when the argument that the CFSP of the Union is considered intergovernmental in nature is considered. That is, the nature of the EU's foreign policy-making and decisionmaking regime has generally been construed as a power-based regime based upon a straightforward rationalist calculation (Moravcsik 1993). EU foreign policy can therefore be conceived of as the expression of lowest common denominator politics which challenges no state's core foreign policy interests.…”
Section: A Conventional View Of Enlargement and The Cfspmentioning
confidence: 99%