2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2016.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preferences and the home bias in trade

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a trade study, Armington (1969) first proposed that home and foreign goods were differentiated based purely on the origin of their production and that consumers favored goods produced in their home countries. Morey (2016) recently verified that consumers place greater value on items produced in their own country when origin was the only tangible difference in the products. Numerous studies have shown that consumers are often willing to pay a premium for fresh food products produced within the region in which they live (Grebitus, Lusk, & Nayga, 2013; Jekanowski, Williams, & Schiek, 2000; Peterson, Taylor, & Baudouin, 2015; Toler, Briggeman, Lusk, & Adams, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a trade study, Armington (1969) first proposed that home and foreign goods were differentiated based purely on the origin of their production and that consumers favored goods produced in their home countries. Morey (2016) recently verified that consumers place greater value on items produced in their own country when origin was the only tangible difference in the products. Numerous studies have shown that consumers are often willing to pay a premium for fresh food products produced within the region in which they live (Grebitus, Lusk, & Nayga, 2013; Jekanowski, Williams, & Schiek, 2000; Peterson, Taylor, & Baudouin, 2015; Toler, Briggeman, Lusk, & Adams, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… The mechanism has already been widely used in laboratory settings, and also in field experiments to elicit consumer preferences for such diverse items as meat quality, solar kits, rice origin, mosquito nets, water and hygiene, and rainfall insurance (Lusk et al 2001; Hoffmann 2009; Cole, Stein, and Tobacman 2014; Guiteras et al 2016; Morey 2016; Alem and Dugoua 2018; Grimm et al 2018). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also note that villagers are not unfamiliar with paying for cookstoves: while the widely used three-stone stove is free of any monetary charge, around 82 percent of sampled households have paid for a stove in the past.9 The mechanism has already been widely used in laboratory settings, but also in field experiments to elicit consumer preferences for such diverse items as meat quality, rice origin, mosquito nets, water and hygiene, and rainfall insurances(Guiteras et al 2016;Lusk et al 2001;Morey 2016;Hoffmann 2009;Cole et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%